2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02465121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on estimates in the total-variation metric

Abstract: Abstract. For sums of independent lattice random variables, the limiting normal approximation is trivial if the total-variation distance is considered. In this paper, we show that the normal distribution can be replaced by a suitably chosen lattice distribution. Mixtures of distributions are approximated by a convolution of the normal and Poisson laws. Construction of an asymptotic expansion is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although central limit theorems in the total variation have been studied in some special circumstances (see, e.g., [8,14]), it is generally believed that the total variation distance is too strong for normal approximation (see, e.g., Čekanavičius [4], Chen and Leong [7], Fang [10]). For example, the total variation distance between any binomial distribution and any normal distribution is always 1.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although central limit theorems in the total variation have been studied in some special circumstances (see, e.g., [8,14]), it is generally believed that the total variation distance is too strong for normal approximation (see, e.g., Čekanavičius [4], Chen and Leong [7], Fang [10]). For example, the total variation distance between any binomial distribution and any normal distribution is always 1.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CLTs with errors measured in the total variation distance have been studied in some special circumstances (see, e.g., [19,36,2]), it is generally believed that the total variation distance is too strong for quantifying the errors in normal approximation (see, e.g., [9,12,21]). For example, the total variation distance between any discrete distribution and any normal distribution is always 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%