2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0027763000027173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on free mutual information and orbital free entropy

Abstract: The present notes provide a proof of i * (CP + C(I − P ) ; CQ + C(I − Q)) = −χ orb (P, Q) for any pair of projections P, Q with τ (P ) = τ (Q) = 1/2. The proof includes new extra observations, such as a subordination result in terms of Loewner equations. A study of the general case is also given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent preprint [37], Zhong has studied the multiplicative version of Biane's free heat flow, using related subordination technology to prove similar smoothness properties of the law of the free unitary Brownian motion multiplied by a free unitary. These results bear on the very recent related work of Izumi and Ueda [20], as described below in Remark 1.12 below.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the recent preprint [37], Zhong has studied the multiplicative version of Biane's free heat flow, using related subordination technology to prove similar smoothness properties of the law of the free unitary Brownian motion multiplied by a free unitary. These results bear on the very recent related work of Izumi and Ueda [20], as described below in Remark 1.12 below.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Remark 1.12. Theorem 1.11 was also recently proved in the preprint [20], which was posted to the arXiv seven months after the first public version of the present manuscript. Indeed, using the Jakowski transform as in [9], Izumi and Ueda show that µ t can be identified with the spectral measure of the product of a free unitary Brownian motion with a free unitary operator whose distribution is determined by the initial projections (p, q).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This quantity χ orb has many properties in common with i * , but there is no general relationship between them so far. A few years ago, Collins and Kemp [3] gave a proof of the identity i * (CP + C(I − P ); CQ + C(I − Q)) = χ orb (P ) + χ orb (Q) − χ orb (P, Q) = −χ orb (P, Q) for two projections of traces 1 2 and the same result was subsequently proved by Izumi and Ueda in [8] with a completely independent proof. Motivated both by the ideas in [8] and the heuristic argument in [7,Section 3.2], we developed in [5] a theory of subordination for the liberation process of symmetries which allowed us to establish some partial results generalizing the equality i * = −χ orb for two projections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This subordination relation is used in [8,Lemma 4.4] to prove that the equality i * = −χ orb holds, for any two projections, under the assumption that K(t, .) define a function of Hardy class H 3 (D) for any t > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the rank of this symmetry vanishes when the rank of the projection equals 1/2 and in this case, U t and Y 2t shares the same spectrum ( [11]). Note that this last result was subsequently generalized in [14] to the case of two projections with equal rank 1/2 and to arbitrary distributions of U 0 . Note also that at the analytic level, the moment generating functions of U t and of J t (the latter is viewed as an element of the compressed algebra) are related to each other by the Szegö map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%