2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.01088
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on proper conflict-free colorings of graphs

Abstract: A vertex coloring of a graph is said to be conflict-free with respect to neighborhoods if for every non-isolated vertex there is a color appearing exactly once in its (open) neighborhood. As defined in [Fabrici et al., Proper Conflict-free and Unique-maximum Colorings of Planar Graphs with Respect to Neighborhoods, arXiv preprint], the minimum number of colors in any such proper coloring of graph G is the PCF chromatic number of G, denoted χ pcf (G). In this paper, we determine the value of this graph paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, every forest has treewidth at most 1, so Theorem 1.4 implies that every forest is conflict-free 3-choosable. It implies an earlier result in [7] stating that every forest is proper conflict-free 3-colorable. Note that this bound is tight since the 3-vertex path is not proper conflict-free 2-colorable.…”
Section: Our Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, every forest has treewidth at most 1, so Theorem 1.4 implies that every forest is conflict-free 3-choosable. It implies an earlier result in [7] stating that every forest is proper conflict-free 3-colorable. Note that this bound is tight since the 3-vertex path is not proper conflict-free 2-colorable.…”
Section: Our Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…So Theorem 1.4 implies that every chordal graph with maximum degree at most ∆ is conflict-free (2∆ + 1)-choosable. It implies a result in [7] stating that every chordal graph with maximum degree at most ∆ is properly conflict-free (2∆ + 1)-colorable. In addition, every forest has treewidth at most 1, so Theorem 1.4 implies that every forest is conflict-free 3-choosable.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that Theorem 1 is best possible as the conflict-free chromatic number is not bounded by the 1-strong colouring number [2]. Before proving Theorem 1, we highlight several noteworthy consequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Dujmović, Morin, and Odak [6] proved a more general upper bound of O(k 5 ) for the odd chromatic number of k-planar graphs. See [1,2,4] for other results concerning these new graph parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%