Grounding 2002
DOI: 10.1515/9783110899801.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on the English grounding systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we investigated two adjectives which have postdeterminer uses relating to the nominal deictic notions of space and quantity 8 (Langacker 2002b), opposite and complete. As noted by Bolinger (1967), nouns incorporating a temporal dimension may take postdeterminers that temporally or modally qualify the implied state or event, as in the future king, a sure win (Bolinger 1967: 20).…”
Section: Data Methodology and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, we investigated two adjectives which have postdeterminer uses relating to the nominal deictic notions of space and quantity 8 (Langacker 2002b), opposite and complete. As noted by Bolinger (1967), nouns incorporating a temporal dimension may take postdeterminers that temporally or modally qualify the implied state or event, as in the future king, a sure win (Bolinger 1967: 20).…”
Section: Data Methodology and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Langacker (2002b), who strongly contrasts spatial nominal deixis with temporal clausal deixis, Nuyts (2005: 19, 22) stresses that SoAs are situated both in time and space, with time having scope over space. Assessing the temporal and spatial Figure 1.…”
Section: Generalizing From the Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La notion de texte, donc, renvoie aux séquences connexes de signes et de signaux, dans leur signification conventionnelle, telles qu'elles sont produites par l'énonciateur et (dans le cadre des interactions parlées familières) également par le coénonciateur. Certains des signes et signaux ainsi produits pointent vers des manières possibles d'ancrer le discours à construire dans un contexte particulier, en termes cognitifs (voir aussi Langacker, 2002aLangacker, , 2002b. Ces signaux correspondent à ce que Gumperz (1992a, p. 234) dénomme « indices de contextualisation » (voir aussi Auer, 1992, de même que Gumperz, 1992b).…”
Section: Texteunclassified
“…+ nom + -là) -la variante marquée ayant un degré plus élevé de déicticité que la variante non marquée (cf. Langacker, 2002b, p. 34, Lyons, 1975. Les adverbes démonstratifs (par ex.…”
Section: Deixisunclassified
“… Deixis is here taken in a broad sense, as in Langacker (2002) or Davidse, Breban & Van linden (2008), dealing with everything that helps the addressee to identify what the speaker intends to refer to. This is typically done by elements like demonstratives, which either literally or linguistically point at a specific referent in the real world or in the world of discourse (see also Rijkhoff 2002: 173 – 4), but other means can be deployed as well: Davidse (2004) argues that quantification also can serve deictic purposes, and Davidse et al (2008) ascribe deictic force to spatial adjectives like opposite .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%