2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00020-018-2424-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on the Operator-Norm Convergence of the Trotter Product Formula

Abstract: We revise the operator-norm convergence of the Trotter product formula for a pair {A, B} of generators of semigroups on a Banach space. Operator-norm convergence holds true if the dominating operator A generates a holomorphic contraction semigroup and B is a A-infinitesimally small generator of a contraction semigroup, in particular, if B is a bounded operator. Inspired by studies of evolution semigroups it is shown in the present paper that the operator-norm convergence generally fails even for bounded operat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case the family {B(t)} t∈I reduces to a non-negative bounded measurable function: b(•) : I −→ R which has to be Hölder continuous with exponent β ∈ (0, 1). For that case it was found in [36] that the convergence rate is O(n −β ) which coincides with (1.7). For the Lipschitz case it was found O(n −1 ) which suggests that (1.8) and (1.9) might be not optimal.…”
Section: Holds △supporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In that case the family {B(t)} t∈I reduces to a non-negative bounded measurable function: b(•) : I −→ R which has to be Hölder continuous with exponent β ∈ (0, 1). For that case it was found in [36] that the convergence rate is O(n −β ) which coincides with (1.7). For the Lipschitz case it was found O(n −1 ) which suggests that (1.8) and (1.9) might be not optimal.…”
Section: Holds △supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Proof. [36] immediately yields that the corresponding evolution semigroup {U(τ) = e −τK } τ∈R + satisfies the estimates (3.3) for γ = 1. △ Now we set…”
Section: Lemma 32 Let the Assumptions (S1) And (S2) Be Satisfied Thmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important question is how fast the error decreases in the approximation expression provided by the Chernoff theorem as n tends to infinity, and the same question for the Trotter product formula e A+B = lim n→∞ (e A/n e B/n ) n . The research here is far from the endinig, several recent papers are [64,65,66].…”
Section: Chernoff Theorem and Chernoff Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13, Theorem 3.2]) If the function: q ∈ C 0,β ([0, T ]), β ∈ (0, 1], is non-negative, then for n → ∞ one getssup τ≥0 e −τ(D 0 +Q) − e −τD 0 /n e −τQ/n n = O(1/n β ) .Now a natural question that one may to ask is: what happens, when q is simply continuous?Theorem 4.3 ([13, Theorem 3.3]) If q : [0, 1] → C, is continuous and non-negative, then for n → ∞ e −τ(D 0 +Q) − e −τD 0 /n e −τQ/n n = o(1) . (4.30)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%