1954
DOI: 10.2307/1483957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on the Species Concept in Paleontology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1958
1958
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In zoology, species are natural units defined on reproductive barriers to gene flow, notwithstanding operational challenges for their delineation. In palaeontology, addition of the time factor requires limits that are subjective and more or less arbitrary, and in any case different from the limits in zoology (Drooger 1954). Vertebrate palaeontology typically works with one or a very few specimens and so is unable to assess characters against a backdrop of inter-individual variation within species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In zoology, species are natural units defined on reproductive barriers to gene flow, notwithstanding operational challenges for their delineation. In palaeontology, addition of the time factor requires limits that are subjective and more or less arbitrary, and in any case different from the limits in zoology (Drooger 1954). Vertebrate palaeontology typically works with one or a very few specimens and so is unable to assess characters against a backdrop of inter-individual variation within species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the validity of subspecies as taxonomic entities lies in the concept of geographical variation (i.e. the organization of morphological variation following a geographical pattern; Wilson and Brown ; Drooger ; Mayr ; Thorpe ; Mallet ). Otherwise, subspecies become just arbitrary sections in a continuum of variation.…”
Section: The Genus Ptychomya In the Lower Cretaceous Of Argentinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le terme « sous-esp£ce », dont on a tant fait usage ces dernieres annees, suppose ma inte s fois un meme type d'isolemcnt, mais avec une signification plus « Ipurde ». Je suis d'accord avec Drooger (1954) ä propos du terme « varidt4 » ; bien qu'il ne soit pas officiellement reconnu en taxinomie, il peut souvent donner une possibilito ideale d'evitement quand il est question de points fixes dans une longue serie, montrant une variabilite restreinte ou grande. Aussi, dans-le cas present de la « race » blesense, prc^rerais-je le terme « variete » « subspecies ».…”
Section: Comparaisons Avec D'autres Espicesunclassified