2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36498-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on Turbo ASMs for Functional Equations and Recursion Schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way one can de ne a general ASM submachine concept that ts the synchronous parallel view of ASMs and supports the two abstraction levels de ned by the black-box and the white-box view of submachines (see [21]). It also supports the traditional understanding of recursive machine calls (see [12] The Initialize submachine o ers the possibility that the designer works with a black-box view|of an atomic operation that pushes all initialization methods in the right order onto the frame stack, followed by calling the Java interpreter to execute them (in the inverse order)|whereas the programmer and the veri er work with the re ned white-box view, which provides the necessary details to implement the machine and to analyze its global properties of interest (see [22]). …”
Section: Asm Submachinessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the same way one can de ne a general ASM submachine concept that ts the synchronous parallel view of ASMs and supports the two abstraction levels de ned by the black-box and the white-box view of submachines (see [21]). It also supports the traditional understanding of recursive machine calls (see [12] The Initialize submachine o ers the possibility that the designer works with a black-box view|of an atomic operation that pushes all initialization methods in the right order onto the frame stack, followed by calling the Java interpreter to execute them (in the inverse order)|whereas the programmer and the veri er work with the re ned white-box view, which provides the necessary details to implement the machine and to analyze its global properties of interest (see [22]). …”
Section: Asm Submachinessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We therefore advice to use asynchronous ASMs only where really appropriate. See in this context also [8]. Table 1.…”
Section: Semantics Of Standard Abstract State Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…That characterization also covers our usage of fresh local variables x , avoiding to introduce a new inference rule into the semantical description of ASPs. One can use a similar expedient to the one introduced in [8] to separate the 'logical' (read-only) variables from the variables for locations (write-variables). It suffices to write varIncar (x ) instead of x with a monadic function varIncar which takes variable incarnations as arguments; to guarantee that different incarnations of x are stored in different locations it suffices to pass to varIncar different arguments x , x .…”
Section: Semantics Of Standard Abstract State Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If more than one branch gets activated, possibly concurrently, the activity following the merge is started for every activation of every incoming branch." 4 To capture the two Thread Merge variants it suffices to instantiate Activity to the set of execution threads in the considered single branch of a process and to declare MergeNo as static respectively dynamic. It is unclear whether there is a difference worth the two namings between the Synchronizer and the ThreadMerge pattern besides considering in the latter only the "execution threads in a single branch of the same process instance".…”
Section: Mergementioning
confidence: 99%