2009
DOI: 10.1080/10668920802662412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remedial Testing and Placement in Community Colleges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because all sample sizes are not small, a z test for each effect size can be given by the effect size ÷ standard error. Horn et al (2009) did not report the standard error for the regression coefficient but did report that the coefficient's p value was less than .05 (but presumably larger than .01); 0.216 is the standard error that yields p = .011. The model without covariates has a standard error of 0.245 so 0.216 does seem reasonable.…”
Section: Degree Attainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because all sample sizes are not small, a z test for each effect size can be given by the effect size ÷ standard error. Horn et al (2009) did not report the standard error for the regression coefficient but did report that the coefficient's p value was less than .05 (but presumably larger than .01); 0.216 is the standard error that yields p = .011. The model without covariates has a standard error of 0.245 so 0.216 does seem reasonable.…”
Section: Degree Attainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, approximately 40 percent of all undergraduate students across the country enroll in a remedial course at some point in their college career (Attewell et al, 2006;Bettinger & Long, 2005;Horn et al, 2009;Illich et al, 2004;Waycaster, 2001).…”
Section: Cost Of Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%