2014
DOI: 10.1080/10894160.2014.896617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediating Affect: “Luclyn” and Lesbian Intimacy on YouTube

Abstract: This article focuses on Kaelyn and Lucy, a long distance (US-UK) lesbian couple who document their relationship on YouTube. Their channel has attracted a following of hundreds of thousands of individuals who profess to feeling an intimate attachment to the couple. This article considers how Kaelyn and Lucy's performance of lesbian intimacy online has amassed such a following. In exploring the multiple feelings that Kaelyn and Lucy's YouTube channel contains, it builds on and contributes to theorizing online em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In thinking about digitally mediated intimacy, I join other social media scholars who find analytic promise in Lauren Berlant's work (Kofoed & Charlotte, 2016;McBean, 2014). Asserting that intimacy may operate publically and at any distance, Berlant (1998) observes that the "kinds of connections that impact on people, and on which they depend for living (if not 'a life'), do not always respect the predictable forms" (p. 284).…”
Section: Attending To the Visual And Affective Dynamics Of Intimacymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In thinking about digitally mediated intimacy, I join other social media scholars who find analytic promise in Lauren Berlant's work (Kofoed & Charlotte, 2016;McBean, 2014). Asserting that intimacy may operate publically and at any distance, Berlant (1998) observes that the "kinds of connections that impact on people, and on which they depend for living (if not 'a life'), do not always respect the predictable forms" (p. 284).…”
Section: Attending To the Visual And Affective Dynamics Of Intimacymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These intimacies are predominantly produced through gay and lesbian users' affective encounters with same-sex texts, images, sounds, videos, and other audiovisual materials on social media. Mcbean's (2014) study of the videos through which a long-distance lesbian couple communicated on YouTube, for example, finds that their audiovisual performance of lesbian intimacy emotionally bonds same-sex viewers. The repeated re-blogging of explicit images/videos on Tumblr also connects LGBTQ users through the circulation of sexual affects (Cho, 2015).…”
Section: Social Media Same-sex Affect and Affective Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media has become an important site at which sexual minorities acquire intimacy for their desires fall outside heteronormative acceptability (Attwood et al., 2017; Cho, 2015; Mcbean, 2014; McGlotten, 2013). These intimacies are predominantly produced through gay and lesbian users’ affective encounters with same-sex texts, images, sounds, videos, and other audiovisual materials on social media.…”
Section: Social Media Same-sex Affect and Affective Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarded as ‘objects, mediators and repositories of affect’ (Kuntsman 2012:6), social media sites, YouTube among them, have attracted a growing body of research in cultural and media studies (e.g. Karatzogianni & Kuntsman 2012; Knudsen & Stage 2015; McBean 2014; Reestorff 2015). Kuntsman (2009), among others, has studied what might be termed, following Billig (1995), ‘hot’ nationalism in cyberspace.…”
Section: Affect Language the Social Media And Everyday Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although questions of method and methodologies in affect research have been of increasing interest in recent years and empirical studies on textual, especially (social) media, material, proliferate (e.g. Wetherell 2012; Mcbean 2014; Knudsen & Stage 2015; Reestorff 2015; for more linguistically oriented studies, see e.g. Chiluwa & Ifukor 2015; Malmquist 2015), more work needs to be done to explore analytical approaches to ‘reading for affect’ at the micro level of language use 10 .…”
Section: Reading For Affect: the Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%