2010
DOI: 10.1080/02702710903054915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediating Reading Comprehension Difficulties: A Cognitive Processing Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research conducted by Keat and Ismail (2011) reveals the relationship between simultaneous processing and reading comprehension, because the correlation (r = .70, p < .01) was found strong. Similar results were obtained by Mahapatra, Das, Stack-Cutler, and Parrila (2010) with correlation r = .75, p < .001 and Mahapatra (2015b) with correlation r = .70, p < .01. Georgiou and Das (2014) consider successive processing a significant predictor of phonemic decoding with correlation r = .44, p < .01.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Research conducted by Keat and Ismail (2011) reveals the relationship between simultaneous processing and reading comprehension, because the correlation (r = .70, p < .01) was found strong. Similar results were obtained by Mahapatra, Das, Stack-Cutler, and Parrila (2010) with correlation r = .75, p < .001 and Mahapatra (2015b) with correlation r = .70, p < .01. Georgiou and Das (2014) consider successive processing a significant predictor of phonemic decoding with correlation r = .44, p < .01.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The corresponding probability level for simultaneous processing was .50. Finally, intervention studies that trained children on successive and simultaneous processing have shown significant effects on reading for both at-risk (e.g., Papadopoulos, Charalambous, Kanari, & Loizou, 2004;Parrila, Das, Kendrick, Papadopoulos, & Kirby, 2000) and reading-disabled children (e.g., Das, Mishra, & Pool, 1995;Hayward, Das, & Janzen, 2007) that were accompanied by an improvement in successive and simultaneous processing (e.g., Mahapatra, Das, Stack-Cutler, & Parrila, 2010).…”
Section: Pass Processes and Readingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But since cognitive processes like PASS are importantly involved in reading, attempts have been made to improve the reading skills of children through programmes like PREP and COGENT that are based on the PASS theory of intelligence and have been found to be effective (Brailsford et. al., 1984;Das, Mishra & Pool, 1995;Mahapatra et. al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%