2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediation of arsenic-contaminated groundwater by in-situ stimulating biogenic precipitation of iron sulfides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XRD results confirmed that several iron sulfide minerals formed including mackinawite, arsenopyrite, and pyrite, with mackinawite constituting the predominate iron sulfide mineral formed. When comparing the Pi et al (2017) study with the study documented in this thesis there are some distinct difference that need to be pointed out. Firstly, the addition of organic carbon in the injection solution in this study provided SRB with electrons that aided in the reduction of sulfate into hydrogen sulfide.…”
Section: Comparison To Similar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…XRD results confirmed that several iron sulfide minerals formed including mackinawite, arsenopyrite, and pyrite, with mackinawite constituting the predominate iron sulfide mineral formed. When comparing the Pi et al (2017) study with the study documented in this thesis there are some distinct difference that need to be pointed out. Firstly, the addition of organic carbon in the injection solution in this study provided SRB with electrons that aided in the reduction of sulfate into hydrogen sulfide.…”
Section: Comparison To Similar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The data presented in this study demonstrates that indigenous SRB in an arsenic contaminated aquifer with slightly reducing conditions can be stimulated by the injection of an added amendment (organic carbon, FeSO4, and fertilizer) to the point of catalyzing sulfate reduction. These conditions led to the formation of arsenian-pyrite and the subsequent decrease Pi et al (2017), the only other field study that was designed to remove arsenic from a contaminated aquifer through the stimulation of SRB and subsequent precipitation of iron sulfide minerals had success with decreasing the overall concentration of arsenic in the aquifer from 593 µg/L to 136 µg/L (77% removal rate). Their short term (55 day) study involved periodic injections of FeSO4 and anoxic water to facilitate a shift to more sulfate reducing conditions and activating in-situ SRB.…”
Section: Comparison To Similar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfide generated by sulfate-reducing bacteria in aquifers abiotically reduces As-bearing iron oxides to mobilize As 1517 . If derived ferrous iron is sufficiently available in groundwater, sulfide could form iron-sulfide minerals to further sequester As through co-precipitation and/or adsorption 1820 . However, the reductive dissolution mechanism only accounts for the initial trigger of arsenate release from iron oxides, but not for the transformation from arsenate to arsenite in reducing aquifers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, microbial activity in aquifers can immensely irritate sulfate reduction and increase generation of ferrous sulfide. Through field practice in the middle of Datong Basin in China, the concentration of As in groundwater decreased from 593 to 136 mg/L and removal rate was up to 77% after 30 days (Pi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Other Repair Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%