2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediation of BTEX plume in a continuous flow model using zeolite-PRB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the aforementioned, it is evident that the minimization of BTEX emissions and remediation of already contaminated matrices play a critical role in human and environmental health. Over the years a series of studies, including advanced oxidation technologies, photocatalysis, sonolysis, radiolysis etc., have been conducted to improve BTEX removal efficiencies (Yerushalmi et al 1999 ; Mascolo et al 2008 ; Braeutigam et al 2009 ; Saponaro et al 2009 ; Laokiat et al 2012 ; Lee et al 2013 ; Caetano et al 2016 ; Al-Sabahi et al 2017 ; Lin et al 2017 ; Dhivakar and Vel rajan 2018 ; Mohan et al 2020 , Vaezihir et al 2020 ). However, still the most popular technique is bioremediation, especially when it is applied in situ, because it is the most cost-effective means of removing many contaminants including BTEX (Cunningham et al 2001 ; Rifai 2005 ; Singh et al 2017 ; Lee et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the aforementioned, it is evident that the minimization of BTEX emissions and remediation of already contaminated matrices play a critical role in human and environmental health. Over the years a series of studies, including advanced oxidation technologies, photocatalysis, sonolysis, radiolysis etc., have been conducted to improve BTEX removal efficiencies (Yerushalmi et al 1999 ; Mascolo et al 2008 ; Braeutigam et al 2009 ; Saponaro et al 2009 ; Laokiat et al 2012 ; Lee et al 2013 ; Caetano et al 2016 ; Al-Sabahi et al 2017 ; Lin et al 2017 ; Dhivakar and Vel rajan 2018 ; Mohan et al 2020 , Vaezihir et al 2020 ). However, still the most popular technique is bioremediation, especially when it is applied in situ, because it is the most cost-effective means of removing many contaminants including BTEX (Cunningham et al 2001 ; Rifai 2005 ; Singh et al 2017 ; Lee et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen no organic related compound was found fortunately in both water samples. This could be attributed to a phenomenon called self-puri cation and attenuation of water that progressively eliminates the additional organic contamination loaded due to any reason and leads the aquatic ecosystems to recover almost its original balance with the surrounding environment over the years (Vaezihir et al 2020;Oliva González et al 2014).…”
Section: Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggested that filters containing the ZSM-5 and 13X, placed in succession, can constitute an efficient adsorption system suitable for the in situ abatement of contaminants in groundwater, such as in the Permeable Reactive Barriers system (PRB). This water remediation technology is often preferred with respect to thermal desorption, groundwater pump-and-treat systems, biodegradation, chemical oxidation, and reduction because of the significant technical and economic advantages, as well as low impacts on the environment [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. With respect to other remediation technologies, the PRB option represents the optimum solution in longevity and cost and does not suffer from back diffusion and rebound issues [68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Structural and Thermal Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%