2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediation practices for health profession students and clinicians: An integrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, it includes qualitative and quantitative, experimental or non-experimental, empirical or theoretical, or mixed study designs for a given research issue or topic, contrary Energies 2023, 16, 6696 3 of 21 to a systematic review process that mainly concerns empirical research. Another benefit that this process provides is that it considers discussion papers, opinion justifications, policy documents, policy research, strategy analysis, and reports, which are additional sources of valuable references, establishing a deeper understanding of the particular topic in question [17][18][19][20]. Notably, this review process surpasses the potential to purely review the literature since it overcomes the traditional process of merely analyzing and synthesizing the current study results [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it includes qualitative and quantitative, experimental or non-experimental, empirical or theoretical, or mixed study designs for a given research issue or topic, contrary Energies 2023, 16, 6696 3 of 21 to a systematic review process that mainly concerns empirical research. Another benefit that this process provides is that it considers discussion papers, opinion justifications, policy documents, policy research, strategy analysis, and reports, which are additional sources of valuable references, establishing a deeper understanding of the particular topic in question [17][18][19][20]. Notably, this review process surpasses the potential to purely review the literature since it overcomes the traditional process of merely analyzing and synthesizing the current study results [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should note that many authors have adopted the PRISMA flowchart (indicatively see [86]) to visualize and conduct their review process. This approach is highly referenced and recommended in the relevant literature and is dependable for conducting similar reviews.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%