2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remember Keppra: seizure control with subcutaneous levetiracetam infusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of subcutaneous levetiracetam might be alluring due to the potential avoidance of sedation associated with subcutaneous midazolam or phenobarbital and the ensuing ethical implications 7. However, the paucity of published and unpublished randomised controlled trials on its use and limited clinical experience currently limit its use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of subcutaneous levetiracetam might be alluring due to the potential avoidance of sedation associated with subcutaneous midazolam or phenobarbital and the ensuing ethical implications 7. However, the paucity of published and unpublished randomised controlled trials on its use and limited clinical experience currently limit its use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of off licence subcutaneous levetiracetam offers the possibility of maintaining seizure control when the oral route is lost without increasing the level of sedation7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the included sources, 57.9% (n = 33/57) were of European origin. Almost half and thus the majority of the European sources (48.5%, n = 16/33) originated from the United Kingdom [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] followed by Spain (n = 7/33, 21.2%), [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] France, [45][46][47] and Germany [48][49][50] (both with n = 3/33, 9.1% each). Other represented countries were Denmark, 51 Italy, 52 Portugal, 53 and Norway, 54 each contributing one source.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Sources Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,52,62,63,74 One randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial 59 and one randomized double-blind cross-over trial 61 were identified. The other articles (n = 47/57, 82.5%) were studies with more than a third (n = 21/57, 36.8%) case reports or series, 23,24,28,31,32,35,36,38,39,43,45,46,[53][54][55]57,58,66,72,73,75 followed by 17.5% (n = 10/57) descriptive analyses/ reports, 21,22,27,30,33,34,37,40,44,[47][48][49][50]56,64,65,[67][68][69][70]77,78 with nine of those specifically pe...…”
Section: Characteristics Of Sources Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%