Remembering Empires: Between Civilisational Nationalism and Post-National Pluralism

Fisher-Onar, Nora

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55199-5_17

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Brubaker (2017:1192) highlighted how contemporary national populism in Northern and Western Europe distinguishes itself not in a narrowly national sense but in broader civilisational terms. This aligns with Fisher‐Onar's (2021:388) concept of “civilisational nationalism”, defined as cultural nationalism that invokes an imagined imperial golden age of religious and racial purity and consequently calls for “the purging of differences from inside the nation, and the exclusion of religious and racial ‘others’ who seek admission”.…”

Section: Tracking Environment Race and Civilisationism In The Afrsupporting

confidence: 67%

“…However, scholars have rightly stressed that far‐right civilisationism is not a radical or revolutionary break from neoliberal‐conservative politics, but rather an alternate strategy arisen from disillusionment with mainstream leaders (Stewart 2020:1208), and that the far‐right have no monopoly on the ideology (Fisher‐Onar 2021:390). Yet the AFR are frequently viewed as ideological “extremists” (Campion 2019b; Moore and Roberts 2022), which naturally positions their politics as at odds with the mainstream (Bötticher 2017).…”

Section: Obscure Definitions and Far‐right Civilisationismmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Wardens of Civilisation: The Political Ecology of Australian Far‐Right Civilisationism

McFadden

2022

Antipode

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The notion of a superior “civilisation” has been a hallmark of the politics of Western institutions and fringe white supremacists alike. Known ideologically as “civilisationism”, it has occupied a prominent position in the ideology of the Australian far‐right. Paying tribute to their settler‐colonial origins, the far‐right has consistently promoted “white civilisation”, even inspiring terrorist attacks. Despite this propensity for violence, far‐right civilisationism remains largely unexplored. Through investigating a dataset of Australian far‐right content, this paper reveals civilisationism as a significant part of their ideology, an ideology which relies on the idealisation of European technologies and environments to render Indigenous land and people uncivilised. A critical narrative analysis of the data illustrates the ways that these ecological factors are drawn into narrative to articulate Australian far‐right civilisationism, an ideology inseparable from the political ecology of European history and colonialism, that today represents a particularly virulent version of its legacy.

show abstract

Section: Tracking Environment Race and Civilisationism In The Afrsupporting

confidence: 67%

Section: Obscure Definitions and Far‐right Civilisationismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wardens of Civilisation: The Political Ecology of Australian Far‐Right Civilisationism

McFadden

2022

Antipode

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Attempts to keep refugees outside the EU's borders or in camps on its 'peripheries', the use of asymmetric economic power vis-à-vis third countries (Langan and Price, 2020) and intensifying efforts to enhance 'strategic autonomy' and hard power capabilities (Youngs, 2021) all indicate that the Union is not on course to changing 'what passes for "normal" in global politics' (Manners, 2002). Instead, recent developments suggest the EU is adapting to the geopolitical frames of other powers such as Russia, China or a United States where civilizationalist logics are also gaining ground (Fisher-Onar, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Reflexively Decentre EU Foreign Policy: Dissonance and Contrapuntal Reconstruction in Migration, Religious and Neighbourhood Governance

Wolff

Gazsi

Huber

et al. 2022

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article develops a timely new model for EU foreign policy by advancing the call for a ‘decentring agenda’, focused on the challenge of inclusive ‘reconstruction’. It does so by first staking out an ontological space at the intersection of empirical multiplexity and normative pluriversality. Within this space, it proposes an ethically informed methodological tool: the contrapuntal negotiation of dissonant perspectives on common governance challenges. It then suggests ways to reconstruct analytical and policy‐making processes and outcomes on the basis of mutuality and local empowerment. Using three scales of ‘contrapuntality’ (micro, meso and macro) to read key empirical sites at the intersection of the EU's internal and external policies (migration, religious and neighbourhood governance), it argues that by decentring in these and further arenas, the EU can seek to become a more reflexive global actor in sync with the ethical and practical demands of our multiplex world.

show abstract

“I am the Granddaughter of the Ottomans”: Gender, Aesthetics and Agency in Neo-Ottoman Imaginaries—An Introduction

Raudvere

Onur²

2022

Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Remembering Empires: Between Civilisational Nationalism and Post-National Pluralism

Cited by 9 publications

References 20 publications

Wardens of Civilisation: The Political Ecology of Australian Far‐Right Civilisationism

Wardens of Civilisation: The Political Ecology of Australian Far‐Right Civilisationism

How to Reflexively Decentre EU Foreign Policy: Dissonance and Contrapuntal Reconstruction in Migration, Religious and Neighbourhood Governance

“I am the Granddaughter of the Ottomans”: Gender, Aesthetics and Agency in Neo-Ottoman Imaginaries—An Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About