2021
DOI: 10.5194/gc-4-1-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remembering rhythm and rhyme: memorability of narratives for science communication

Abstract: Abstract. Once upon a time, narratives were considered to be a non-reliable way of representing and communicating science. Nowadays, narratives are widely accepted as an accurate way of conveying science; they represent an effective emotional trigger, a lasting memory structure and a powerful aid for learning. To study how memorable different ways of presenting information can be is a fundamental task for science communication in order to evaluate materials that not only need to be understood by the general pu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the science communication researcher interested in comparing the potential of different genre as science communication tools, this presents a problem. For example, to avoid substantially different text lengths, in their study of the effectiveness of fictional narratives in communicating science as compared to other text formats, Negrete and Lartigue reduced the length of Primo Levi's 'Nitrogen' and Anatoly Denieprov's 'Crabs take Over the Islands' (by deleting some parts of the stories) [Negrete & Lartigue, 2010]. However, shortening existing stories runs the risk of eliminating essential features of the story and may not create the same overall effect on the reader [Weitkamp, 2019].…”
Section: Considerations For Science Short Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the science communication researcher interested in comparing the potential of different genre as science communication tools, this presents a problem. For example, to avoid substantially different text lengths, in their study of the effectiveness of fictional narratives in communicating science as compared to other text formats, Negrete and Lartigue reduced the length of Primo Levi's 'Nitrogen' and Anatoly Denieprov's 'Crabs take Over the Islands' (by deleting some parts of the stories) [Negrete & Lartigue, 2010]. However, shortening existing stories runs the risk of eliminating essential features of the story and may not create the same overall effect on the reader [Weitkamp, 2019].…”
Section: Considerations For Science Short Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research also suggests that stories can improve learning processes [Avraamidou & Osborne, 2009;Constant & Roberts, 2017;Kaplan & Dahlstrom, 2017;Lejano, Tavares-Reager & Berkes, 2013;Mar & Oatley, 2008] and enhance the duration of fact recall [Haven, 2007;Negrete & Lartigue, 2010]. For example, studies show that narratives can promote the retention of information acquired by audiences for longer compared with the same facts presented alone [Dahlstrom, 2012;Negrete, 2013Negrete, , 2021Lartigue, Negrete, Velasco & González Villarreal, 2016;Rios & Negrete, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, stories can be used to promote the learning of academic content (Prins et al, 2017). When applied in classes, stories can promote greater retention of information and a deeper understanding of the subject (e.g., Negrete & Lartigue, 2010). Considering the persuasive power of narratives (Green & Brock, 2000), stories become a valuable resource to learn and adopt self-regulatory strategies (e.g., cognitive and behavioral).…”
Section: The Writing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CriaTivo was theoretically grounded on the construct of self-regulated learning, which comprises the planning, monitoring and revising strategies (Zimmerman, 2013). Furthermore, it resorts to active and engaging methodologies (e.g., reading aloud, dual-coding, and use of acronyms to support learning and recall), the use of which has been recommended across the literature since they facilitate the learning process (e.g., Negrete & Lartigue, 2010), stimulate children imagination, strengthen motivational factors, and increase students' writing skills (Aram & Biron, 2004;Graham, Liu et al, 2018). Together, the explicit instruction of self-regulation strategies, the use of engaging methodologies and the support of a narrative that models and guides the training, CriaTivo enables the development of transversal learning-related competencies (e.g., metacognitive strategies) while applying them to the writing process (e.g., planning and monitoring the written composition, time management, self-reflection on the process and the writing product).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroscience research demonstrates that when stories are presented vividly, with descriptors that engage all five senses, sensory areas of listeners' brains are activated and their brain activity can match the storyteller's; this suggests they are experiencing the same event to some degree (Green et al, 2018). Moreover, research suggests that narrative communication is processed in a cognitive pathway distinct from the pathway that processes expository communications and that narratives can result in faster reading time, higher comprehension, higher recall, and longer-term information retention (Dahlstrom, 2014;Glaser et al, 2009;Negrete & Lartigue, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%