Remembering the Cuban Missile Crisis: Should We Swallow Oral History?

Kramer, Mark; Allyn, Bruce J.; Blight, James G.; Welch, David A.

doi:10.2307/2538987

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1991

2010

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 13 publications

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

2007

APSC

451

196

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores the relationship between the method of process tracing and the data collection technique of elite interviewing. The process tracing method has become an increasingly used and cited tool in qualitative research, a trend that has recently accelerated with the publication of Alexander George and Andrew Bennett's text (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. That book outlines and explores the process tracing method in detail, highlighting its advantages for exploring causal processes and analyzing complex decision-making. Yet while the book presents a rigorous and compelling account of the process tracing method and its critical importance to case study research, the value of the method itself remains contested in some quarters, and there are aspects of George and Bennett's treatment of it that require further exploration.

show abstract

The Cuban missile crisis: On historical judgment and inference: A reply to mark kramer

Blight

Welch

1996

Security Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Remembering the Cuban Missile Crisis: Should We Swallow Oral History?

Cited by 13 publications

References 7 publications

Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling

Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling

Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling

The Cuban missile crisis: On historical judgment and inference: A reply to mark kramer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About