1952
DOI: 10.1037/h0057402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reminiscence as a function of the amount of change in the intertrial interval.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first-trial decrement data provide further evidence that an extended rest period can lead to response decrements. Teichner and Holder (1952) have previously demonstrated the interaction of the facilitating effect of IR dissipation and the decremental effect of the change in stimulation associated with the intertrial interval. Since the animals of present experiment were placed in the retention box for the appropriate interval before the first trial, the obtained first trial decrement appears to be more dependent upon response-produced stimulation than upon reinstatement of the immediate pretrial cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first-trial decrement data provide further evidence that an extended rest period can lead to response decrements. Teichner and Holder (1952) have previously demonstrated the interaction of the facilitating effect of IR dissipation and the decremental effect of the change in stimulation associated with the intertrial interval. Since the animals of present experiment were placed in the retention box for the appropriate interval before the first trial, the obtained first trial decrement appears to be more dependent upon response-produced stimulation than upon reinstatement of the immediate pretrial cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tulane University CHANGED Many investigators (Reynolds, 1945;Sheffield, 1950;Stanley, 1952;Teichner, 1952;Wilson, Weiss, & Amsel, 1955) have reported faster extinction following a change in intertrial interval at the onset of extinction. This observation led to the hypothesis (Reynolds, 1945;Rothkopf, 1953Rothkopf, , 1955Teichner, 1952;Teichner & Holder, 1952) that the stimulus complex present at the beginning of a trial in a series of relatively massed trials includes temporally decaying traces of response-produced stimulation from the preceding trial or trials. The response, then, is conditioned to whatever magnitude of such traces remains at the end of the intertrial interval.…”
Section: Response Strength As a Function Of Intertrial Interval 1 Cla...mentioning
confidence: 99%