1968
DOI: 10.1143/ptps.e68.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reminiscences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
124
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that work the point of view is expressed, that the wavefunction (and as result the Wigner function, we notice) has no objective value and does not covariantly transform when there are classical interventions. Here we note that in principle equation (19) can be written with four-dimensional Lorentz invariant symbols only, but to do this we have to incorporate in the theory a certain time-like unit vector in a way similar to Tomonaga-Schwinger approach to quantum field theory [28,29]. It is the four-velocity of the frame where the wavefunction collapse occurs (the measuring device frame) relative to the second static observer (watching observer).…”
Section: Matrix-valued Wigner Function and Quantum Liouville Equmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that work the point of view is expressed, that the wavefunction (and as result the Wigner function, we notice) has no objective value and does not covariantly transform when there are classical interventions. Here we note that in principle equation (19) can be written with four-dimensional Lorentz invariant symbols only, but to do this we have to incorporate in the theory a certain time-like unit vector in a way similar to Tomonaga-Schwinger approach to quantum field theory [28,29]. It is the four-velocity of the frame where the wavefunction collapse occurs (the measuring device frame) relative to the second static observer (watching observer).…”
Section: Matrix-valued Wigner Function and Quantum Liouville Equmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of evolving a quantum field from any Cauchy surface to any other seems to have originated in the mid 1940's with the work of Tomonaga [1] and Schwinger [2] on relativistic quantum field theory. Tomonaga and Schwinger wanted an invariant generalization of the Schrödinger equation, which describes time evolution of the state of a quantum field relative to a fixed inertial reference frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [3], we use the term functional evolution to refer to the formulation of dynamical evolution in which one evolves quantities along arbitrary Cauchy surfaces. 1 Thus the Tomonaga-Schwinger equation appears as the analog of the Schrödinger equation, when describing functional evolution. It was (and still is) tacitly assumed that the Tomonaga-Schwinger equation defines the infinitesimal form of unitary evolution of states from one Cauchy surface to another, just as the more familiar (and mathematically more tractable) Schrödinger equation describes the infinitesimal form of unitary evolution between two hyperplanes of constant Minkowskian time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper was translated in English in 1946. [24] ( Fig.7) The first sentence of the paper was that "Recently Yukawa has made a comprehensive consideration about the basis of the quantum theory of wave fields. In his article he has pointed out the fact that the existing formalism of the quantum field theory is not yet perfectly relativistic".…”
Section: Tomonaga's Super Many-time Theory Was Inspired By Yukawa's Amentioning
confidence: 99%