2001
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.12.1428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remitting fasciitis without eosinophilia: a new disease entity? A case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eosinophilic infiltrates are present in 69–75% of patients, but their presence is not mandatory for the diagnosis of EF . Eosinophils can be absent in the chronic stage of the disease , after treatment with glucocorticoids , or in the context of profound leukopenia as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Eosinophilic infiltrates are present in 69–75% of patients, but their presence is not mandatory for the diagnosis of EF . Eosinophils can be absent in the chronic stage of the disease , after treatment with glucocorticoids , or in the context of profound leukopenia as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The diagnosis of EF is confirmed by a deep biopsy, skin to muscle, which shows fibrosis of the fascia and an infiltrate of lymphocytes, histiocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils localized within the dermis, fascia, epimysium, perimysium or endomysium. Of note, eosinophils are not required for the diagnosis of EF; eosinophilic infiltration and peripheral eosinophilia may be absent at the chronic stage of the disease [13], or after CS treatment [14], as most likely was the case with our patient. Membrane attack complex C5b9 deposits, described in our patient's muscle biopsy, are usually seen in dermatomyositis and point toward an immune-based myopathy.…”
Section: Clinical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%