2007
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200610348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REML Estimation of Variance Parameters in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models Using the SAEM Algorithm

Abstract: Nonlinear mixed effects models are now widely used in biometrical studies, especially in pharmacokinetic research or for the analysis of growth traits for agricultural and laboratory species. Most of these studies, however, are often based on ML estimation procedures, which are known to be biased downwards. A few REML extensions have been proposed, but only for approximated methods. The aim of this paper is to present a REML implementation for nonlinear mixed effects models within an exact estimation scheme, b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensions of this work to the case of REML estimation can be easily adapted following the approach developed in Meza et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensions of this work to the case of REML estimation can be easily adapted following the approach developed in Meza et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several efforts have been made to get confidence intervals for this PK parameter [6,7,[17][18][19][20]. For the other parameters, obtaining uncertainty measures is still an issue.…”
Section: Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for Euclidean response variables, efficient estimation methods for nonlinear mixed effects models are still being actively studied in literature, e.g., Alternating algorithms [44], Laplacian and adaptive Gaussian quadrature algorithms [46], as well as generalized EM algorithms with MCMC [47]. Unfortunately, this issue only gets worse in the manifold setting.…”
Section: Parameter Estimation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%