“…However, these changes in sedimentation may be equally well explained by southward obduction of Neo-Tethys intraoceanic rocks, including ophiolitic fragments and subduction-accretion complexes, onto the northern margin of India during Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary time prior to India-Asia collision Burg and Chen, 1984;Burg et al, 1987;Searle et al, 1987;Beck et al, 1996;Gnos et al, 1997;Makovsky et al, 1999;Aitchison et al, 2000]. Further questioning an early age for collision in southern Tibet is the lack of evidence for Asian-derived detritus or increased rates of tectonic subsidence in Paleocene -Eocene strata of the Tethyan Himalaya [Rowley, 1996[Rowley, , 1998Aitchison et al, 2000Aitchison et al, , 2002. This, together with recognition of an Indian promontory in Kashmir [e.g., Treloar and Coward, 1991], counterclockwise rotation of India [e.g., Patriat and Achache, 1984;Klootwijk et al, 1985;Dewey et al, 1989], and the lack of evidence for Paleocene to early Eocene high-pressure metamorphism within the central and eastern Himalaya, have contributed to the popular view that collision first began in the western Himalaya and subsequently propagated eastward [e.g., Rowley, 1996].…”