2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(00)00287-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remnants of a Cretaceous intra-oceanic subduction system within the Yarlung–Zangbo suture (southern Tibet)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
207
4
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
207
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in sedimentation patterns and the appearance of accretionary prism and arc material within Maastrichtian strata of the southern Tibetan Tethyan Himalaya have been attributed to onset of interaction between India and Asia at this time [e.g., Liu and Einsele, 1994;Shi and Yin, 1995;Liu and Einsele, 1996;Willems et al, 1996]. However, these changes in sedimentation may be equally well explained by southward obduction of Neo-Tethys intraoceanic rocks, including ophiolitic fragments and subduction-accretion complexes, onto the northern margin of India during Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary time prior to India-Asia collision Burg and Chen, 1984;Burg et al, 1987;Searle et al, 1987;Beck et al, 1996;Gnos et al, 1997;Makovsky et al, 1999;Aitchison et al, 2000]. Further questioning an early age for collision in southern Tibet is the lack of evidence for Asian-derived detritus or increased rates of tectonic subsidence in Paleocene -Eocene strata of the Tethyan Himalaya [Rowley, 1996[Rowley, , 1998Aitchison et al, 2000Aitchison et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in sedimentation patterns and the appearance of accretionary prism and arc material within Maastrichtian strata of the southern Tibetan Tethyan Himalaya have been attributed to onset of interaction between India and Asia at this time [e.g., Liu and Einsele, 1994;Shi and Yin, 1995;Liu and Einsele, 1996;Willems et al, 1996]. However, these changes in sedimentation may be equally well explained by southward obduction of Neo-Tethys intraoceanic rocks, including ophiolitic fragments and subduction-accretion complexes, onto the northern margin of India during Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary time prior to India-Asia collision Burg and Chen, 1984;Burg et al, 1987;Searle et al, 1987;Beck et al, 1996;Gnos et al, 1997;Makovsky et al, 1999;Aitchison et al, 2000]. Further questioning an early age for collision in southern Tibet is the lack of evidence for Asian-derived detritus or increased rates of tectonic subsidence in Paleocene -Eocene strata of the Tethyan Himalaya [Rowley, 1996[Rowley, , 1998Aitchison et al, 2000Aitchison et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these changes in sedimentation may be equally well explained by southward obduction of Neo-Tethys intraoceanic rocks, including ophiolitic fragments and subduction-accretion complexes, onto the northern margin of India during Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary time prior to India-Asia collision Burg and Chen, 1984;Burg et al, 1987;Searle et al, 1987;Beck et al, 1996;Gnos et al, 1997;Makovsky et al, 1999;Aitchison et al, 2000]. Further questioning an early age for collision in southern Tibet is the lack of evidence for Asian-derived detritus or increased rates of tectonic subsidence in Paleocene -Eocene strata of the Tethyan Himalaya [Rowley, 1996[Rowley, , 1998Aitchison et al, 2000Aitchison et al, , 2002. This, together with recognition of an Indian promontory in Kashmir [e.g., Treloar and Coward, 1991], counterclockwise rotation of India [e.g., Patriat and Achache, 1984;Klootwijk et al, 1985;Dewey et al, 1989], and the lack of evidence for Paleocene to early Eocene high-pressure metamorphism within the central and eastern Himalaya, have contributed to the popular view that collision first began in the western Himalaya and subsequently propagated eastward [e.g., Rowley, 1996].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tectonic setting Although it has been widely accepted that the southern Lhasa sub-block was in an arc setting related to the subduction of the Neo-Tethyan oceanic slab during the Jurassic-Cretaceous (Debon et al, 1986;Harris et al, 1990;Chung et al, 2005;Kapp et al, 2005;Pan et al, 2006;Decelles et al, 2007;Kapp et al, 2007;Wen et al, 2008a;Zhu et al, 2009;Kang et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2012), details of the tectonic setting and nature of the southern Lhasa sub-block have recently been an issue of debate. Previous investigations have suggested either a Cretaceous intra-oceanic subduction system within the Indus-Yarlung Tsangpo Suture (Aitchison et al, 2000(Aitchison et al, , 2007 or a juvenile island arc block accreted to the Lhasa block during the Late Paleozoic (e.g., Ji et al, 2009a,b;Zhu et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition zone is massive dunite, several to hundreds of meters in thickness. The mantle sequence consists of clinopyroxene-bearing harzburgites (lherzolites) and harzburgites which contain dunite lenses and abundant pods of chromitites [6,7,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromitites were initially thought to have bearing on the formation and evolution of the ophiolite. The Luobusa ophiolite originated at a mid-ocean ridge spreading center at 177 ± 31 Ma and was later modified by supra-subduction zone (SSZ) magmatism at 120 ± 10 Ma involving an intra-oceanic subduction system [5][6][7]41,53,54]. However, the presence of ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) and highly reduced minerals such as diamond, coesite, and native elements, initially found in the chromitites but more recently also in their host peridotites, requires additional processes or models to outline the genesis of the chromitites (e.g., [4,10,11,13,[17][18][19][20][55][56][57]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%