2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remodelling the evolution of grain size distribution in galaxies

Abstract: We revisit the evolution model of grain size distribution in a galaxy for the ultimate purpose of implementing it in hydrodynamical simulations. We simplify the previous model in such a way that some model-dependent assumptions are replaced with simpler functional forms. For the first test of the developed framework, we apply it to a onezone chemical evolution model of a galaxy, confirming that our new model satisfactorily reproduces the previous results and that efficient coagulation of small grains produced … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(284 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dust is produced from the late stage of stellar evolution-namely supernovae (SNe) and stellar winds of asymptotic giant branch stars (e.g., Dwek 1998;Aoyama et al 2017;Gjergo et al 2018)grows in the interstellar medium (ISM), especially in dense molecular clouds (e.g., Hirashita & Voshchinnikov 2014); and is destroyed by SN shocks (e.g., Aoyama et al 2017). Such dust processes substantially alter the dust abundance and the size distribution of dust grains (e.g., Asano et al 2013;Aoyama et al 2017;Hirashita & Aoyama 2019) and hence affect the absorption and scattering of light (see Galliano 2018 for a review). Therefore, to better understand the formation and evolution of galaxies, we should know how and how much stellar light is reprocessed by the dust extinction/attenuation effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dust is produced from the late stage of stellar evolution-namely supernovae (SNe) and stellar winds of asymptotic giant branch stars (e.g., Dwek 1998;Aoyama et al 2017;Gjergo et al 2018)grows in the interstellar medium (ISM), especially in dense molecular clouds (e.g., Hirashita & Voshchinnikov 2014); and is destroyed by SN shocks (e.g., Aoyama et al 2017). Such dust processes substantially alter the dust abundance and the size distribution of dust grains (e.g., Asano et al 2013;Aoyama et al 2017;Hirashita & Aoyama 2019) and hence affect the absorption and scattering of light (see Galliano 2018 for a review). Therefore, to better understand the formation and evolution of galaxies, we should know how and how much stellar light is reprocessed by the dust extinction/attenuation effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate description of the dust content and the grain size distribution would require to follow in detail the processes involved in the grains formation and destruction, whose efficiency depends on the local gas physical conditions, such as density, temperature, metallicity (see e.g. Hirashita & Aoyama 2019;Aoyama et al 2020). This detailed treatment of the dust physics is beyond the scope of our work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaskell et al 2004;Czerny et al 2004;Gallerani et al 2010) and justified by theoretical models (e.g. Hirashita & Aoyama 2019;Nozawa et al 2015).…”
Section: Comparison With Quasar Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since there is no available physical model for the fragment mass distribution in rotational disruption, we use the fragment distribution function in shattering as a guide. The maximum and minimum masses of the fragments produced from a grain mass m 1 are assumed to be m f,max = 0.02m 1 and m f,min = 10 −6 m f,max , respectively (Guillet et al 2011;Hirashita & Aoyama 2019). We adopt the following mass distribution function of fragments produced from a grain with mass m 1 : The above fragment mass distribution could be optimistic in the number of small fragments, but we basically adopt it to investigate a possibility of rotational disruption being an alternative to shattering for small-grain production.…”
Section: Effect Of Rotational Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%