2003
DOI: 10.1071/wr02077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote collection of animal DNA and its applications in conservation management and understanding the population biology of rare and cryptic species

Abstract: Abstract.Obtaining useful information about elusive or endangered species can be logistically difficult, particularly if relying entirely on field signs such as hair, feathers or faeces. However, recent developments in molecular technology add substantially to the utility of such 'non-invasive' samples, which provide a source of DNA that can be used to identify not only species but also individuals and their gender. This provides great potential to improve the accuracy of abundance estimates and determine beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
129
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major drawbacks of non-invasive sampling, the generally small amount and low quality of genetic material (Piggott and Taylor 2003), has been overcome by our current approach. As demonstrated, we were able to amplify species-specific microsatellites with high amplification success (96.2%) and comparably low error rate (ADO, 4.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the major drawbacks of non-invasive sampling, the generally small amount and low quality of genetic material (Piggott and Taylor 2003), has been overcome by our current approach. As demonstrated, we were able to amplify species-specific microsatellites with high amplification success (96.2%) and comparably low error rate (ADO, 4.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those methods allow researchers to collect samples without any observer bias or negative consequences for individuals due to handling or stress. Therefore, they are most frequently applied in studies with rare, cryptic, or endangered species (Piggott and Taylor 2003;Waits and Paetkau 2005). The source of sample material together with DNA extraction methods and PCR conditions is among the most crucial sources of error (Beja Pereira et al 2009;Broquet et al 2007;Taberlet et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, by unobtrusively collecting biological material (e.g., feces, hairs, feathers, saliva and mucus) from wild populations, researchers can study these species without disturbing, handling, or even observing them, thus reducing risks to both animals and researchers. Second, noninvasive genetic sampling enables biologists to study populations of elusive and rare species, a task that can prove difficult with more traditional live-trapping approaches 6 . And third, NGS can potentially increase sample sizes by reducing disturbance to animals, sampling efforts, and costs, thus helping to minimise biases in estimates of population parameters 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dealing with the special habitat requirements, poor dispersal capabilities, sensitivity to human disturbance, and low detection probabilities typically associated with many rare, habitat specific or cryptic species, pose serious challenges for conservation planning (Piggott & Taylor 2003). Conservation efforts are desperately required to address the issue of habitat connectivity and protection for Juliana's golden mole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%