Remote Electronic Voting Can Be Efficient, Verifiable and Coercion-Resistant

Araújo, Roberto; Barki, Amira; Brunet, Solenn; Traoré, Jacques

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53357-4_15

Cited by 15 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Однак на сьогодні всі пропозиції щодо його вирішення або страждають від деяких недоліків, або недостатньо ефективні для використання на реальних світових виборах» [20]. Загалом для усунення примусового голосування запропоновано наступні механізми -необмежена кількість повторного голосування онлайн, забезпечення можливості голосування обома способами та встановлення переваги фактичного голосу перед електронним, технічна можливість відкликання електронного голосу [21].…”

Section: проблеми легітимізації електронного голосуванняunclassified

Digital technologies in the electoral process: theoretical aspects of compliance with democratic standards

Zharovska

Kovalchuk

2020

ScienceRise: Juridical Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: проблеми легітимізації електронного голосуванняunclassified

Digital technologies in the electoral process: theoretical aspects of compliance with democratic standards

Zharovska

Kovalchuk

2020

ScienceRise: Juridical Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, Aditya et al [49] improve the efficiency of Lee et al's scheme [46] through modified optimistic mix-nets. The scheme in [7] uses two kinds of mix-nets to prevent vote updating from being detected by coercers. However, due to the usage of mix-nets, transparency cannot be guaranteed.…”

Section: Related Work and Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first e-voting scheme proposed by Chaum [44] in 1981 utilizes anonymous channels (i.e., mix-nets). Additional schemes [7,13,[45][46][47][48][49][50] based on mix-nets are proposed afterwards with various optimization. For example, Aditya et al [49] improve the efficiency of Lee et al's scheme [46] through modified optimistic mix-nets.…”

Section: Related Work and Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A number of voting schemes and systems have been proposed [7][8][9][10][11][12]17,30,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”

Section: Related Work and Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several online voting solutions [7][8][9][10][11] have been proposed. Some suggest keeping non-electronic parallels of electronic votes, or saving copies of votes in portable storage devices.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Transparent, Auditable, and Stepwise Verifiable Online E-Voting Enabling an Open and Fair Election

Zou

Feng

et al. 2017

Cryptography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many e-voting techniques have been proposed but not widely used in reality. One of the problems associated with most existing e-voting techniques is the lack of transparency, leading to a failure to deliver voter assurance. In this work, we propose a transparent, auditable, stepwise verifiable, viewable, and mutual restraining e-voting protocol that exploits the existing multi-party political dynamics such as in the US. The new e-voting protocol consists of three original technical contributions-universal verifiable voting vector, forward and backward mutual lock voting, and in-process check and enforcement-that, along with a public real time bulletin board, resolves the apparent conflicts in voting such as anonymity vs. accountability and privacy vs. verifiability. Especially, the trust is split equally among tallying authorities who have conflicting interests and will technically restrain each other. The voting and tallying processes are transparent/viewable to anyone, which allow any voter to visually verify that his vote is indeed counted and also allow any third party to audit the tally, thus, enabling open and fair election. Depending on the voting environment, our interactive protocol is suitable for small groups where interaction is encouraged, while the non-interactive protocol allows large groups to vote without interaction.

show abstract