2016
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2016.1140818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote estimation of water quality parameters of Himalayan lake (Kashmir) using Landsat 8 OLI imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water quality parameters selected as eutrophic and pollution indices were the chlorophyll-a concentration ([Cla]) and water turbidity. Regression analyses were performed using atmospherically corrected true reflectance values of OLI bands downloaded from the USGS web page [12,39,40], and the time series of images were processed and analyzed to obtain the time series of each parameter. The images were processed with ENVI 4.8 remote sensing software (Harris Corporation.…”
Section: Methodology (A) Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The water quality parameters selected as eutrophic and pollution indices were the chlorophyll-a concentration ([Cla]) and water turbidity. Regression analyses were performed using atmospherically corrected true reflectance values of OLI bands downloaded from the USGS web page [12,39,40], and the time series of images were processed and analyzed to obtain the time series of each parameter. The images were processed with ENVI 4.8 remote sensing software (Harris Corporation.…”
Section: Methodology (A) Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the MERIS sensor switch-off, there was a gap in the images available for water quality monitoring. The Landsat 8 satellite was launched on 11 February 2013, then the use of the OLI and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) sensors installed aboard Landsat 8 began [12,13]. Simultaneously, the EU Copernicus program for EO and monitoring started to expand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hicks et al [62] suggest that ideal imagery for these types of studies should not be more than one day apart from the in-situ data collection. However, in most cases, this is not possible due to the temporal resolution of the platform or cloud coverage present in the imagery [3,6,26,60,61]. Furthermore, Barrett and Frazier [63] mention that water quality parameters can be directly influenced by rapidly changing environmental conditions in the study site, and as a result, the utility of predictive models developed from imagery that is generated days or weeks from the day of the in-situ sampling can be detrimentally impacted.…”
Section: Satellite Spatial Resolution Temporal Resolution (Day)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the water quality results and the spatial distribution maps generated in this study, it makes sense that for fully mixed systems (such as the ponds used in this study), fewer sample stations led to more accurate models. The use of satellite remote sensing tools helps to expand the limited discrete sampling point coverage of traditional monitoring plans [3,6,26,59,60]. However, in addition to spatial resolution, two major drawbacks when using these tools are: (1) The longer revisiting time (temporal resolution) of these platforms and (2) cloud coverage limitations.…”
Section: Satellite Spatial Resolution Temporal Resolution (Day)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High spatial resolution is necessary for Chla estimation by satellite remote sensing in relatively small lakes (<5 km 2 square). Chla estimation has been actively tested using Landsat 8 [4,5] and the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) NASA's Terra satellite [6,7], which have spatial resolutions of 15-30 m. However, these satellites do not have adequate observation repeat cycles (16-day cycle) and observation wavelength (no observations near 700 nm, which is the wavelength advantageous for coastal Chla estimation). In contrast, the European Space Agency's (ESA) Sentinel-2 satellites [8] has a 10 m spatial resolution and 10 day temporal resolution (every five days with two satellites).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%