2017
DOI: 10.1177/1074248417707051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Abstract: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is at a pivotal point in its evolution, both in terms of its adoption as a therapy and its viability commercially. The most usual way of inducing RIC, with a standard blood pressure cuff and a stopwatch, is time-consuming and potentially inaccurate and unsafe. Development of automated devices have facilitated large-scale randomized trials and will make clinical deployment of the technique more straightforward. Both the medical and commercial future of RIC will depend on the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 147 publications
(215 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary objective is to examine the duration of the RIC procedure administered in acute chest pain patients with an automated device initiated during ambulance transport. Since an automated device eliminates the need for dedicated personnel to perform manual cuff inflations [10, 25, 26] and based on a prior feasibility study [24], we hypothesize 4 cycles of RIC will be completed in at least 80% of patients having the procedure initiated. Further, we feel 80% is a reasonable lower bound to optimal RIC completion for a full-scale trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary objective is to examine the duration of the RIC procedure administered in acute chest pain patients with an automated device initiated during ambulance transport. Since an automated device eliminates the need for dedicated personnel to perform manual cuff inflations [10, 25, 26] and based on a prior feasibility study [24], we hypothesize 4 cycles of RIC will be completed in at least 80% of patients having the procedure initiated. Further, we feel 80% is a reasonable lower bound to optimal RIC completion for a full-scale trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%