2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Organic Chemistry Laboratories at University of Michigan—Dearborn

Abstract: University of MichiganDearborn offers a one semester, two credit, stand-alone Organic Chemistry Laboratory course aimed at students with an interest in health-related careers. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a campus closure and a subsequent transition to a partially remote laboratory curriculum developed on-the-fly for the Winter 2020 semester followed by a full online course for our summer, accelerated sessions. The online structure is a hybrid of readings, student made videos, instructor demonstrations, labor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, organic chemistry students at the University of Michigan–Dearborn (Dearborn, MI) earned lab report grades comparable to prior cohorts after watching videos, interacting with simulations, analyzing sample data, writing lab reports, and analyzing a procedure and techniques. 50 However, the instructors noted the students evidenced significant difficulty with building on knowledge, connecting topics, using relevant data to generate conclusions, knowing how to execute physical techniques, and incorrectly assuming that a simulated experiment was done. Interestingly, a report comparing the performance on the final (remote) exam between general chemistry students in a traditional lab vs in a general chemistry CURE (students self-selected into either group during course registration—both groups followed the same lab manual during remote learning) at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (Omaha, NE) showed no statistically significant difference between their grades, despite the difference in their laboratory work before ERL.…”
Section: Student Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, organic chemistry students at the University of Michigan–Dearborn (Dearborn, MI) earned lab report grades comparable to prior cohorts after watching videos, interacting with simulations, analyzing sample data, writing lab reports, and analyzing a procedure and techniques. 50 However, the instructors noted the students evidenced significant difficulty with building on knowledge, connecting topics, using relevant data to generate conclusions, knowing how to execute physical techniques, and incorrectly assuming that a simulated experiment was done. Interestingly, a report comparing the performance on the final (remote) exam between general chemistry students in a traditional lab vs in a general chemistry CURE (students self-selected into either group during course registration—both groups followed the same lab manual during remote learning) at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (Omaha, NE) showed no statistically significant difference between their grades, despite the difference in their laboratory work before ERL.…”
Section: Student Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online laboratory instruction in chemistry is not a novel approach and, in fact, is a reasonable alternative when the desired learning goals involve manipulation of variables impossible in a real laboratory or when the desired teaching resources are not available at a larger scale. The development of remote laboratory teaching resources has the advantage that such resources need be prepared only once and then can be used for any number of students in later iterations of delivery. , Online laboratories often involve virtual simulations where a student can manipulate various settings in order to observe different outcomes. , Demonstrated learning gains from these approaches vary by experiment and are not universally successful, underscoring the need for careful forethought when determining which experiments, or even which disciplines, can be effectively delivered via online simulation. , In particular, the development of practical and technical laboratory skills remains a significant challenge for online laboratories. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing laboratory experiments on polymers can connect students with real-world applications, spark and promote students’ interests in science, and help students visualize some fundamental concepts in chemistry. , Several in-person lab experiments on synthesis, characterization, analysis, and applications of polymers were previously covered in the Journal of Chemical Education and recently (2017) published in the Journal of Chemical Education Special Issue on Polymer Concepts across the Curriculum . Specifically, polymer syntheses using different polymerization techniques such as radical polymerization (e.g., free-radical, controlled/living: ATRP and RAFT , ), ring-opening polymerization (ROP) , and ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP), , and photopolymerization , were modified to design experiments for undergraduate (UG) laboratories; however, they were all designed for in-person experiments. Contrarily, many lab activities were envisioned, designed, and implemented for remote education even before pandemic time, and several new studies have also been published in 2020, particularly in the Special Issue: Insights Gained While Teaching Chemistry in the Time of COVID-19 . Despite the breadth of the literature on distance learning, new virtual laboratory experiments incorporating polymers are missing and can be beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%