Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2674005.2675013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Peering

Abstract: The trend toward more peering between networks is commonly conflated with the trend of Internet flattening, i.e., reduction in the number of intermediary organizations on Internet paths. Indeed, direct peering interconnections bypass layer-3 transit providers and make the Internet flatter. This paper studies an emerging phenomenon that separates the two trends: we present the first systematic study of remote peering, an interconnection where remote networks peer via a layer-2 provider. Our measurements reveal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presence in these facilities enable direct peering with thousands of networks simultaneously. While IXPs are typically meant to keep local traffic local, in recent years remote peering [20] has emerged as an approach to reach main content, transit and access networks. We use a recent PeeringDB snapshot (October 2022) and investigate differences in inter-and intra-continental distance between all peering facilities to identify a suitable threshold for intercontinental LHL.…”
Section: Distances For Long-haul Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence in these facilities enable direct peering with thousands of networks simultaneously. While IXPs are typically meant to keep local traffic local, in recent years remote peering [20] has emerged as an approach to reach main content, transit and access networks. We use a recent PeeringDB snapshot (October 2022) and investigate differences in inter-and intra-continental distance between all peering facilities to identify a suitable threshold for intercontinental LHL.…”
Section: Distances For Long-haul Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75% of the IXP interfaces are within 2ms from the respective VP. More than 20% of the interfaces have RTT min > 10ms, a 2-fold increase since 2014 [35,36].…”
Section: Application Of Step-wise Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many small networks like regional eyeball network and enterprises may not have easy access to an IXP nor can afford personnel and hardware cost to be present and operate in a colocation center or an IXP. Such limitations will lead to networks being left behind as they can not benefit from the increasing interconnection between Hypergiants, which in turn can potentially contribute to a digital divide [6,11]. Our motivation for this work is that even though Hypergiants have direct interconnections or co-hosting arrangements with many ISPs they do not have these with all ASes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%