2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40737-020-00175-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Psychosocial Rehabilitation (rPSR): A Broad View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Face-to-face rehabilitation was commonly used before the coronavirus disease (COVID- 19) pandemic. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, community-dwelling older adults have limited access to public health services and limited participation in classic face-to-face rehabilitation and community treatment services [1,2]. These situations negatively affected the motor, cognitive, and psychosocial functions of older adults [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face-to-face rehabilitation was commonly used before the coronavirus disease (COVID- 19) pandemic. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, community-dwelling older adults have limited access to public health services and limited participation in classic face-to-face rehabilitation and community treatment services [1,2]. These situations negatively affected the motor, cognitive, and psychosocial functions of older adults [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, limitations to access to public health services and to participate in classic patterns of treatments and community services are common [1,2]. These situations affect negatively motor, cognitive, and psychosocial functions in the elderly [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These situations affect negatively motor, cognitive, and psychosocial functions in the elderly [3,4]. Especially, the elderly need continuous rehabilitation to maintain functions [2,5] and are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the intervention model was the duplicity and ambivalence of the “anticipation of events” [ 24 ]—by following the user’s dysfunctional anticipation of catastrophic hypotheses, the professional could guide a rewriting of such anticipations through social support. Following this model, the professional practice included social support [ 26 , 27 ] and the buffering effect it can have [ 28 , 29 ]; psychological, educational, and psychosocial rehabilitation [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]; and clinical, observational, experiential, and psychodiagnostic methods. Furthermore, the psychological intervention offered the user to recognize and distinguish between the request made, the type of support indicated, and the implicit need [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%