2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing algorithms for estimation of fractional vegetation cover using pure vegetation index values: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
121
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
5
121
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…0 ≤ FVC < 0.30 and 0.30 ≤ FVC < 0.45 were considered as the non-vegetation and the low vegetation-covered areas, respectively. 0.45 ≤FVC < 0.60 and FVC ≥ 0.60 were regarded as the medium vegetation and the high vegetation-covered areas, respectively [102]. Fig.…”
Section: F Selection Of Machine Learning Regression Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 ≤ FVC < 0.30 and 0.30 ≤ FVC < 0.45 were considered as the non-vegetation and the low vegetation-covered areas, respectively. 0.45 ≤FVC < 0.60 and FVC ≥ 0.60 were regarded as the medium vegetation and the high vegetation-covered areas, respectively [102]. Fig.…”
Section: F Selection Of Machine Learning Regression Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vegetation index method is a common tool for remote sensing to monitor the growth and distribution of vegetation (Mu et al 2018;Osgouei et al 2019). This index is widely used to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate vegetation coverage (Osgouei and Kaya 2017;Gao et al 2020). At present, the most common vegetation index is the NDVI, and the formula is shown below:…”
Section: Ndvi and Lst Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the empirical method estimates FVC values by calculating the regression relationship between FVC and reflectance of specific bands or vegetation indices, which presents satisfactory performance at small region for specific vegetation types [30]. However, the established empirical models have great uncertainties when they are applied at a large region, because the relationship is changed with various vegetation types and land conditions [31]. For pixel unmixing models, a basic assumption is that each pixel is composed of several components, referred to as endmembers, and the proportion of green vegetation components is considered as the corresponding FVC value [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pixel unmixing models, a basic assumption is that each pixel is composed of several components, referred to as endmembers, and the proportion of green vegetation components is considered as the corresponding FVC value [32]. With clear physical assumptions, pixel unmixing models are easy to understand and widely used for FVC estimation [31,33]. However, due to the complex land surface conditions and complex spectral characteristics of various land objects over large region, it is difficult to determine the representative endmembers [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%