2005
DOI: 10.1080/08120090500181077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing and GIS analyses of the Strangways impact structure, Northern Territory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, for craters on Earth, these data can be used by field geologists to correlate features mapped on the ground (e.g. Zumsprekel and Bischoff, 2005). Another method for deriving morphometry and altimetry is the use of individual or paired stereo images (i.e.…”
Section: Morphometry Altimetry Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for craters on Earth, these data can be used by field geologists to correlate features mapped on the ground (e.g. Zumsprekel and Bischoff, 2005). Another method for deriving morphometry and altimetry is the use of individual or paired stereo images (i.e.…”
Section: Morphometry Altimetry Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From remnants of about 10 km diameter central uplift we can assume an original crater diameter of ~40 km, relying on the analogy with the well‐studied Puchezh‐Katunki impact crater (Ivanov ), in parallel with original estimates by Shoemaker and Shoemaker (), and in contrast with the 24–26 km diameter mentioned by other authors (Spray et al. ; Zumsprekel and Bischoff ; Glikson ). We do not know if such an impact could have affected the Snowball thermo‐atmospheric dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only known late Neoproterozoic impact structure (http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/ Agesort.html) is Strangways, Northern Territory, Australia, with a measured age of 646 AE 42 Ma (Spray et al 1999). From remnants of about 10 km diameter central uplift we can assume an original crater diameter of 40 km, relying on the analogy with the well-studied Puchezh-Katunki impact crater (Ivanov 2007), in parallel with original estimates by Shoemaker and Shoemaker (1996), and in contrast with the 24-26 km diameter mentioned by other authors (Spray et al 1999;Zumsprekel and Bischoff 2005;Glikson 2018). We do not know if such an impact could have affected the Snowball thermo-atmospheric dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%