2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-012-0255-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing and GIS Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment using Binary Logistic Regression Model: A Case Study in the Ganeshganga Watershed, Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A coefficient of or very close to 0 indicates a factor not being influential in landslide occurrence. The LR model estimates the coefficients and statistics, based on the values of independent variables and the status of the dependent variable in a sample of data, using a maximum likelihood method [46]. Using the outcomes derived from the implementation of model on the selected sample, the probability of landslide occurrence can be calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coefficient of or very close to 0 indicates a factor not being influential in landslide occurrence. The LR model estimates the coefficients and statistics, based on the values of independent variables and the status of the dependent variable in a sample of data, using a maximum likelihood method [46]. Using the outcomes derived from the implementation of model on the selected sample, the probability of landslide occurrence can be calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one is the commonly-used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Since a test with perfect discrimination always produces a curve passing through the upper left corner of the plot, the closer the ROC curve is to the upper left corner, the more accurate are the landslide predictive results [83,84]. The AUC value ranges from 0.5-1, and it is close to 1, representing that the model is perfectly reasonable for prediction [85].…”
Section: Objective Evaluation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s, a number of authors used LHZ mapping (Gupta and Joshi 1990;Gupta and Anbalagan 1997;Nagarajan et al 1998;Saha et al 2002). Another term 'landslide susceptibility' , in this context was given as spatial probability of occurrence of landslides based on a set of geo-environmental factors (Brabb 1984;Sarkar and Kanungo 2004;Lee and Sambath 2006;Kundu et al 2013;Kayastha et al 2013). Some authors are using the term 'landslide hazard mapping' in accordance with the definition of natural hazard given by UNO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several quantitative and semiquantitative techniques were applied for landslide susceptibility/hazard modelling in Himalayan terrain. Logistic regression technique for data integration of geoenvironmental factors (Das et al 2010), empirical modelling of landslide susceptibility in the Darjeeling Himalayas (Ghosh et al 2011) and several others (Das et al 2012;Kayastha et al 2013;Kundu et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%