1980
DOI: 10.2307/634969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
127
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,289 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
127
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum likelihood classification (MLC) algorithm (supervised classification) was performed to prepare the LULC map [85]. Confusion or error matrix was used to validate the classification result [86], and a good agreement was found (overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient of 89.38 and 0.8711, respectively). Figure 3 shows the LULC map of the study area.…”
Section: Spatial Data Processing For Groundwater Potential Zone Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum likelihood classification (MLC) algorithm (supervised classification) was performed to prepare the LULC map [85]. Confusion or error matrix was used to validate the classification result [86], and a good agreement was found (overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient of 89.38 and 0.8711, respectively). Figure 3 shows the LULC map of the study area.…”
Section: Spatial Data Processing For Groundwater Potential Zone Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear features on a satellite image regularly reflect the geological lineaments (faults or fractures) and hydrological structures (river or shoreline) [Lillesand et al, 2004] Analysis of the lineament network for different time periods images allows highlighting of the orientation of them ( fig. 3).…”
Section: Results Of Researches and Their Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum-likelihood classifier was adopted from a parametric classification algorithm [27][28][29][30] and divided into four classes: urban, vegetation, forest and waterbodies ( Table 2). The classes that were involved in the selection of the training sites were used as a reference in the user-guided approach [17,[31][32][33][34]. For each of the predetermined change detection types, training samples were selected by delimiting the polygons in the study area.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%