1994
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)90046-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 1. The scale and spatial aggregation problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Aggregating the spatial resolution of the subset imagery In this section, each band of 2 m pan-sharpened multi-spectral subset imagery was aggregated progressively using the nearest neighboring algorithm to obtain a series of imagery with varying spatial resolutions. Many studies [10,28,29] support the utility of the nearest neighboring approach to resample the remote sensing imagery. The aggregating way includes arithmetic progression and geometric progression.…”
Section: The Average Local Variance Function (Alv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Aggregating the spatial resolution of the subset imagery In this section, each band of 2 m pan-sharpened multi-spectral subset imagery was aggregated progressively using the nearest neighboring algorithm to obtain a series of imagery with varying spatial resolutions. Many studies [10,28,29] support the utility of the nearest neighboring approach to resample the remote sensing imagery. The aggregating way includes arithmetic progression and geometric progression.…”
Section: The Average Local Variance Function (Alv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies [10,28,29] support the utility of the nearest neighboring approach to resample the remote sensing imagery. The aggregating way includes arithmetic progression and geometric progression.…”
Section: The Average Local Variance Function (Alv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies, examining the effect of spatial scale on remote sensing applications (e.g., [62,63]), conclude that the impact of spatial scale originates from the relation between the size of the objects under observation and the size of the pixels (e.g., [40]). The pixel size offering the highest information content for the various applications is often determined by means of statistical analysis of the local variance of the pixel neighborhood.…”
Section: Spectrally Simulated Enmap and Sentinel-2 Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to capture the change in image characteristics due to changes in resolution, and find relationships between accuracy and resolutions, it is necessary to build a framework to represent, analyze and classify images from multiple resolutions [32]. This framework could be a useful tool for selecting the appropriate spatial resolutions and analysis routines in further image classification [31,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Spatial Resolution Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies reported in the literature have used multiple resolution remote sensing data to study changes in vegetation indices [30,36], surface complexity and variation [1,[7][8][9]37], classification accuracy and errors [34,35,38], image representation and storage [31], and ecosystem and landscape analysis in general [39,40]. However, much of the previous research has been devoted to exploring the magnitude and impact of scale or resolution effects by aggregation of a single data set (i.e., re-sampling the data) [32].…”
Section: Spatial Resolution Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%