2013
DOI: 10.5721/eujrs20134617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing Classification Using Fuzzy C-means Clustering with Spatial Constraints Based on Markov Random Field

Abstract: This paper proposes a new clustering algorithm which integrates Fuzzy C-means clustering with Markov random field (FCM). The density function of the first principal component which sufficiently reflects the class differences and is applied in determining of initial labels for FCM algorithm. Thus, the sensitivity to the random initial values can be avoided. Meanwhile, this algorithm takes into account the spatial correlation information of pixels. The experiments on the synthetic and QuickBird images show that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classes were defined through a set of rules and organized in hierarchical groups, so that a child class inherited properties from the parent one. The classification process was carried out either by specifying thresholds for each rule (crisp classification) [Comber et al, 2012], by specifying a set of probability density functions (fuzzy classification) [HongLei et al, 2013] or through a k-Nearest Neighbour (NN) approach [Chirici et al, 2012]. Figure 5 shows the workflow.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classes were defined through a set of rules and organized in hierarchical groups, so that a child class inherited properties from the parent one. The classification process was carried out either by specifying thresholds for each rule (crisp classification) [Comber et al, 2012], by specifying a set of probability density functions (fuzzy classification) [HongLei et al, 2013] or through a k-Nearest Neighbour (NN) approach [Chirici et al, 2012]. Figure 5 shows the workflow.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional methods using high-resolution image data, the "salt and pepper" effect is very obvious and the rich textural information will be incorrectly considered as noise. This has a great impact on the extracted change information [Blaschke, 2010;Yang et al, 2013;. Therefore, research into change detection methods based on high-resolution images is valuable [Klemas, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using texture information [16], [17], applying simple majority filter [4], segmentation-based clustering [15], [18], using Markov random fields (MRFs) [19], [20], using gradient and edge information [11], [16], spatial prior probability determination [10], and local embedding [21] are some methods for incorporating image spatial information into the clustering process. Spatial features such as texture and applying majority filter on the clustering results can incorporate some spatial aspects of data into the feature space, but they do not have a comprehensive strategy for image clustering [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%