Earth Observation for Land and Emergency Monitoring 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781118793787.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing for Aboveground Biomass Estimation in Boreal Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For HV-backscatter, scenes acquired over forests in "non-frozen" state were more suitable, as also supported by previous studies [5,7,42]. Overall, polarimetric coherence appeared to be a better predictor of the forest biomass for "frozen" scenes, as well as in winter conditions in the boreal zone (wet snow on March 2007 scene), while for other scenes the difference was quite marginal, aside from August 2006 scene (summer conditions) when the cross-pol backscatter performed better.…”
Section: Forest Stem Volume Estimationsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For HV-backscatter, scenes acquired over forests in "non-frozen" state were more suitable, as also supported by previous studies [5,7,42]. Overall, polarimetric coherence appeared to be a better predictor of the forest biomass for "frozen" scenes, as well as in winter conditions in the boreal zone (wet snow on March 2007 scene), while for other scenes the difference was quite marginal, aside from August 2006 scene (summer conditions) when the cross-pol backscatter performed better.…”
Section: Forest Stem Volume Estimationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Most recent research on L-band SAR based forest biomass (AGB, growing stock volume, stem volume) estimation is well summarized in ( [5], Table 3.1) and in ([6], Table 2). Among recent studies, in [40], the RMSE over natural taiga forest varied 25-32% of the mean biomass (R 2 in the range of 0.35-0.49); and, in [72], RMSE varied 31-46% of the mean biomass value and R 2 was 0.4-0.6 in forest stands in southern Sweden.…”
Section: Relative Performance Of Biomass Estimation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems are of interest as they provide systematic, weather and sun independent observations. Moreover, SAR shows higher sensitivity to AGB in comparison with the optical sensors [9]. The latest results of biomass estimation using optical data (Landsat) showed measures of moderate accuracy, with a relative mean absolute error (rMAE) of approximately 36%, in the boreal zone [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of this work to other biomass estimates is difficult in part because biomass data is fairly limited. We refer readers to the excellent review articles [2] and [6] for numerous AGB studies with radar remote sensing. We note that our reference data set provides orders of magnitude more biomass samples than those found in field measurement AGB studies as our reference data set is lidar-derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%