2006
DOI: 10.2111/05-201r.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing for Grassland Management in the Arid Southwest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
2
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
89
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing dry-season herbaceous vegetation in semi-arid areas is important for a number of applications: forage monitoring, resource management, fire risk and emissions, and also erosion risk assessment (Marsett et al, 2006;Hagen et al, 2012;Ludwig and Tongway, 1995). Still, satellite survey of dry-season vegetation has received far less attention than green vegetation so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observing dry-season herbaceous vegetation in semi-arid areas is important for a number of applications: forage monitoring, resource management, fire risk and emissions, and also erosion risk assessment (Marsett et al, 2006;Hagen et al, 2012;Ludwig and Tongway, 1995). Still, satellite survey of dry-season vegetation has received far less attention than green vegetation so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, broad-scale data on such indicators are generally sparse for such ecosystem types that are not intensively managed. This low sampling density occurs because measuring these indicators in the field is time-intensive and expensive, especially in remote areas (Elzinga et al 1998, Holthausen et al 2005, and broad-scale remote sensing approaches typically cannot yet produce consistent measurements with the required accuracy and precision for long-term monitoring (Marsett et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, the spatial resolution of temperature image make it difficult to discern fine resolution patterns of viscacha Second-order texture measure in a 3×3 moving window: CON contrast, ENT entropy Second-order texture measure in a 3×3 moving window: CON contrast, ENT entropy rat occurrence, so the variability explained by univariate model of temperature was very low. Moreover, our results showed that SATVI was the best greenness index; SATVI is sensitive to green and senescent vegetation because it uses the shortwave infrared band reflectance (bands 5 and 7 in the TM sensor) and furthermore includes the effect of bare soil factor (Marsett et al 2006), an important variable to be considered in arid environments. This greenness index was the best predictor of cover vegetation in the Monte Desert (GoirĂĄn et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We evaluated green indices with a correction factor for soil background effects (Huete 1988) and sensitive to both, green and senescent vegetation (GoirĂĄn et al 2012). We tested raw greenness indices as independent variables in models: NDVI and GI from TC (Kauth and Thomas 1976;Crist and Cicone 1984) both sensitive to green vegetation, NDSVI (Normalized Difference Senescent Vegetation Index; Marsett et al 2006), which quantifies senescent and green biomass, SAVI (Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index; Huete 1988), which is sensitive to green vegetation but includes a parameter that normalizes the effect of bare soil factor, and SATVI (Soil Adjusted Total Vegetation Index; Marsett et al 2006), which is sensitive to both green and senescent vegetation, and includes a parameter that normalizes the effect of bare soil factor. In SAVI and SATVI, the parameter L has values of 1 for low vegetation cover, 0.5 for intermediate values, and 0.25 for high vegetation cover (Huete 1988).…”
Section: Remote Sensing Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%