Remote Sensing for Precision Agriculture: Sentinel-2 Improved Features and Applications

Abstract

The use of satellites to monitor crops and support their management is gathering increasing attention. The improved temporal, spatial, and spectral resolution of the European Space Agency (ESA) launched Sentinel-2 A + B twin platform is paving the way to their popularization in precision agriculture. Besides the Sentinel-2 A + B constellation technical features the open-access nature of the information they generate, and the available support software are a significant improvement for agricultural monitoring. This paper was motivated by the challenges faced by researchers and agrarian institutions entering this field; it aims to frame remote sensing principles and Sentinel-2 applications in agriculture. Thus, we reviewed the features and uses of Sentinel-2 in precision agriculture, including abiotic and biotic stress detection, and agricultural management. We also compared the panoply of satellites currently in use for land remote sensing that are relevant for agriculture to the Sentinel-2 A + B constellation features. Contrasted with previous satellite image systems, the Sentinel-2 A + B twin platform has dramatically increased the capabilities for agricultural monitoring and crop management worldwide. Regarding crop stress monitoring, Sentinel-2 capacities for abiotic and biotic stresses detection represent a great step forward in many ways though not without its limitations; therefore, combinations of field data and different remote sensing techniques may still be needed. We conclude that Sentinel-2 has a wide range of useful applications in agriculture, yet still with room for further improvements. Current and future ways that Sentinel-2 can be utilized are also discussed.

Assessing the Influence of UAV Altitude on Extracted Biophysical Parameters of Young Oil Palm

“…Basically, plants interact with incident solar radiation by absorbing, transmitting, and/or reflecting electromagnetic radiation. The reflected radiation contained information about the plants' biophysical composition and physiological status and is measured with multispectral sensors [34]. In this study, NDVI and NDRE were computed using ArcMap software.…”

Using UAV Collected RGB and Multispectral Images to Evaluate Winter Wheat Performance across a Site Characterized by Century-Old Biochar Patches in Belgium

“…In recent years, remote sensing has been promoted as a means in precision agriculture for detailed spatio-temporal monitoring of crop dynamics [27,28]. A particular focus at present is the use of satellite imagery for precision agricultural practices due to the images' fine spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution [28]. Moreover, high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based imagery can be used to address the data gap in satellite products suffering from cloud coverage [29].…”

Advancements in sensor technology and decision support intelligent tools to assist smart livestock farming

“… Greenwood et al (2016) reviewed the use and application of various sensors, imaging, and other emerging technologies concerning extensive beef production, and González et al (2018) and Halachmi et al (2019) further discussed the attributes of these technologies for livestock production in general. The range of remote, near real-time monitoring technologies being developed or applied or with potential applications for free-ranging livestock and extensive grazing and foraging environments is increasing rapidly and include 1) in-field fixed and ground-, aerial-, and satellite-based measurement of pastures, invasive weeds, and soil, water, and greenhouse gas monitoring using sensors, photogrammetry ( Bloch et al, 2019 ), or other technologies including LiDAR ( Fernández-Quintanilla et al, 2018 ; Reinermann et al, 2020 ; Segarra et al, 2020 ; Weiss et al, 2020 ); 2) multi-channel, satellite-based spectrometry ( Segarra et al, 2020 ), such as WorldView-2 Satellite Sensor ( https://www.satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/worldview-2/ ), which may be coupled with weather and soil grids to model and predict pasture biomass components and to guide grazing management decisions for sheep and cattle ( http://grazingapp.com.au/ ; Badgery et al, 2017 ); 3) body composition ( McPhee et al, 2017 ; Miller et al, 2019 ; Zhao et al, 2020 ) and physiological assessments ( Beiderman et al, 2014 ), including thermal imaging ( Halachmi et al, 2008 , 2013 ) to assess body temperature ( González et al, 2013 ) using devices at, or fixed to, handling facilities; 4) automated in-field liveweight measurement ( Nir et al, 2018 ) and drafting of livestock coupled with radio frequency identification ( RFID ) to determine individual or herd liveweight and growth of cattle ( Charmley et al, 2006 ; González et al, 2014 , 2018 ) and sheep ( Brown et al, 2015 ; González-García et al, 2018a , 2018b ); 5) virtual fencing using global positioning system ( GPS )-enabled collars and a mobile phone app ( https://www.agersens.com/ ) to remotely fence, move and monitor animals, and control herd or flock access to pastures and environmentally sensitive areas without the need for conventional fencing ( Campbell et al, 2019 , 2020 ); 6) on-animal devices to monitor location, activity, and behaviors in grazing and foraging environments ( Dobos et al, 2...…”