2017
DOI: 10.12681/bgsg.11440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing for underwater archaeology: case stud-ies from Greece and Eastern Mediterranean

Abstract: Modern underwater remote sensing technology introduces many advantages that extend the range of conventional diving work providing the means to survey in a detailed and systematic fashion large seafloor area. There are two general approaches regarding the application of these techniques in underwater archaeology; they are being increasingly used to identify, locate and map (i) ancient and historical shipwrecks lying on the seafloor or partly buried in it and (ii) the coastal palaeogeogra-phy and thus submerged… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest challenges in the case of submerged archaeological sites lie in breaking down the physical barrier between the archaeologists and the monument, represented by water, an issue already dealt with for more than a decade now by archaeologists, conservationists, and communication experts [16,17]. With the development and application of RS and EO techniques applied to CH sites, several techniques have also been used for underwater CH sites (UCH), including the use of both passive and active sensors [18,19]. In the case of passive sensors, techniques based on optical sensors are generally used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greatest challenges in the case of submerged archaeological sites lie in breaking down the physical barrier between the archaeologists and the monument, represented by water, an issue already dealt with for more than a decade now by archaeologists, conservationists, and communication experts [16,17]. With the development and application of RS and EO techniques applied to CH sites, several techniques have also been used for underwater CH sites (UCH), including the use of both passive and active sensors [18,19]. In the case of passive sensors, techniques based on optical sensors are generally used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be used (i) from above, as in the case of derived bathymetry from aerial, drone, or satellite images [20][21][22][23][24], or (ii) from operators, boats, and ROVs (Remotely Operated Vehicles), as in the case of the analysis and reconstruction of submerged features using three-dimensional photogrammetry [25][26][27][28]. The active sensors used in RS UCH include the use of electromagnetic and sound waves (sonar), such as (i) single-and multi-beam echosounders, (ii) side-scan sonar, (iii) laser scanners (often combined with optical imaging), (iv) sub bottom profiler, (v) marine magnetometry, and (vi) depth geoelectrics [18,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many archaeological sites have been already 3D reconstructed and can be experienced using VR technologies [11], [12]. For this scope, different methodologies and techniques have been developed and improved during the time [13], [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many archaeological sites have been already 3D reconstructed and can be experienced using VR technologies [6] [7]. For this scope, different methodologies and techniques have been developed and improved during the time [8][9] [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%