2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing for vegetation monitoring in carbon capture storage regions: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote sensing technology has been commonly used in monitoring forest AGC over broad areas due to its wide coverage of observation, timeliness, and repetitive data availability [26,27]. As spectral characteristics of land cover show great differences [28][29][30][31][32], it is one of the important links in current research to accurately quantify various indicators of forest resources [33,34]. Moreover, studies have found that remote sensing data and its derived bands have good practicability for simulating forest AGC [35][36][37]; this is especially the case when combined with machine learning algorithms that allow for large scale automated analysis of high dimensional data from satellites [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing technology has been commonly used in monitoring forest AGC over broad areas due to its wide coverage of observation, timeliness, and repetitive data availability [26,27]. As spectral characteristics of land cover show great differences [28][29][30][31][32], it is one of the important links in current research to accurately quantify various indicators of forest resources [33,34]. Moreover, studies have found that remote sensing data and its derived bands have good practicability for simulating forest AGC [35][36][37]; this is especially the case when combined with machine learning algorithms that allow for large scale automated analysis of high dimensional data from satellites [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecophysiological applications of satellite remotely sensed methods have improved ecosystem-scale predictions of productivity, carbon exchange, water use, leaf area, canopy water content, and species distributions (Waring et al, 1982;Pierce et al, 1990;Running et al, 1995;Renzullo et al, 2008;Adam et al, 2010;Landsberg et al, 2017;Xue and Su, 2017;Moreno-Martínez et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2019). However, current process-based models are hindered by the lack of ground-truthing approaches to validate canopy and leaf-level responses to environmental changes (Liu and Zhou, 2004;Govender et al, 2009;Köhler and Huth, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors with medium and high spatial resolution differ in terms of the number of bands, temporal resolution, scale, and costs. Depending on the classification objective, the scale is a factor to consider, because, when choosing a sensor with a high spatial resolution (<5 m), the cost and complexity of the classification can increase [16]. In addition, with a larger set of data with spectral variability for the same class, the training time can affect the computational cost [17].…”
Section: The Potential Of Image Classification and The Sentinel-2 Satmentioning
confidence: 99%