2017
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2016.2600858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing Image Registration With Modified SIFT and Enhanced Feature Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
171
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then evaluation criterion which consists of correct matches number (N) (Li et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2017) and root mean square error (Gong et al, 2014;Kupfer et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2017), is used to verify the accuracy and robustness of the proposed method. In the paper, we selected the two images with different perspectives that both images as shown Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then evaluation criterion which consists of correct matches number (N) (Li et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2017) and root mean square error (Gong et al, 2014;Kupfer et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2017), is used to verify the accuracy and robustness of the proposed method. In the paper, we selected the two images with different perspectives that both images as shown Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the applied matching strategy in the proposed method, we compare it with the NNDR method, the fast sample consensus (FSC) method [34] and the enhanced matching method (EM) [35]. The interest point detector and descriptor described in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are adopted to extract features for all four matching methods.…”
Section: Matching Strategies Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the taxonomy given in [5] data fusion methods, i.e., processing dealing with data and information from multiple sources to achieve improved information for decision making can be grouped into three main categories: -pixel-level: the pixel values of the sources to be fused are jointly processed [6][7][8][9]; -feature-level: features like lines, regions, keypoints, maps, and so on, are first extracted independently from each source image and subsequently combined to produce higher-level cross-source features, which may represent the desired output or be further processed [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]; -decision-level: the high-level information extracted independently from each source is combined to provide the final outcome, for example using fuzzy logic [18,19], decision trees [20], Bayesian inference [21], Dempster-Shafer theory [22], and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents also the most challenging case because of the several sources of mismatch (temporal, geometrical, spectral, radiometric) among the involved data. As for other categories, a number of typical remote sensing problems can fit this paradigm, such as classification [10,16,[35][36][37], coregistration [15], change detection [38] and feature estimation [4,[39][40][41]. -mixed: the above cases may also occur jointly, generating mixed situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%