2016
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2016.2594080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing Image Stripe Noise Removal: From Image Decomposition Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we compare the proposed method with four state-of-the-art destriping methods: filtering-based methods [16] (WAFT), statistics-based method [23] (SLD), optimization-based method [34] (GSLV) and from image decomposition perspective method [35] (LRSID) which also belongs to optimization-based methods. To highlight the destriping differences between the five compared methods, we mark some obvious differences by red circles or squares in the destriping images.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we compare the proposed method with four state-of-the-art destriping methods: filtering-based methods [16] (WAFT), statistics-based method [23] (SLD), optimization-based method [34] (GSLV) and from image decomposition perspective method [35] (LRSID) which also belongs to optimization-based methods. To highlight the destriping differences between the five compared methods, we mark some obvious differences by red circles or squares in the destriping images.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In remote sensing images stripe noise removal problem, the stripe effects can be regarded as additive noise [24,25,35], and the degradation model can be given by f(x, y) = u(x, y) + s(x, y) + n(x, y),…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Image Decomposition Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations