“…Thus, our framework would be (i) easily transferrable to any forested watershed covered by detailed spatial historical records on disturbance types (e.g., BC, Alberta) and (ii) most likely transferrable to forested watersheds not covered by detailed spatial historical records, by using an adapted indicator of historical forest change, which might be converted into tabulated impedance. In this case, the use of satellite‐derived imagery would be a relevant alternative; these techniques have proven to be effective for detecting different kinds of disturbances and for monitoring diachronic vegetation cover change and recovery (Aires, da Silva, Moreira, Ribeiro, & Ribeiro, 2020; Guindon et al, 2014; Huang et al, 2020, Martini et al, 2020; Khodaee et al, 2020). A variety of indices can be used, for example, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the normalized burn ratio index (NBRI), or the disturbance index (DI).…”