2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017rg000593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives

Abstract: The cloud droplet number concentration (N d) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol‐cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide N d, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (τ c) cloud droplet effective radius (r e) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
337
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(413 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
(419 reference statements)
13
337
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the analysis here the 2.1‐μm effective radius values are used to compute N d from MODIS. While acknowledging the large uncertainties in satellite retrievals of N d (Grosvenor et al, ) and the sparsity of retrievals at high latitudes in winter months a distinct seasonal cycle in N d over the Southern Ocean is observed. Peak concentrations occur in the austral summer months and coincide with peak marine biogenic emissions (McCoy et al, ).…”
Section: Model Developmentssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the analysis here the 2.1‐μm effective radius values are used to compute N d from MODIS. While acknowledging the large uncertainties in satellite retrievals of N d (Grosvenor et al, ) and the sparsity of retrievals at high latitudes in winter months a distinct seasonal cycle in N d over the Southern Ocean is observed. Peak concentrations occur in the austral summer months and coincide with peak marine biogenic emissions (McCoy et al, ).…”
Section: Model Developmentssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Retrieved data have been removed north of 60°N and south of 60°S where retrievals are most uncertain. The simulated N d distributions from GA7 and GA7.1 are in very good agreement with Grosvenor et al () with highest N d concentrations over land and downwind of key source regions. The stratocumulus cloud regions also appear well represented although N d is lower in this region in Bennartz and Rausch ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used SEVIRI-based cloud products (CF, cloud optical depth c , drop effective radius r e , and LWP) generated with the Meteosat Second Generation-Cloud Physical Properties algorithm developed at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute available via http://data.knmi.nl (Roebeling et al, 2006). Potential uncertainties in N d arise from the high sensitivity of N d retrieval to r e (Grosvenor et al, 2018;Szczodrak et al, 2001), especially when r e is relatively small. In order to reduce uncertainty in cloud property retrieval, pixels having c and r e smaller than 3 are excluded from the analysis as these retrievals are less reliable (Sourdeval et al, 2015).…”
Section: Satellite Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For liquid clouds, N d can for instance be inferred through relationships between satellite retrievals of τ c and the droplet r eff (Brenguier et al, 2000). These relationships rely on strong assumptions that have shortcomings 25 (Grosvenor et al, 2018) but nonetheless provide N d values that compare well against in situ observations (Painemal and Zuidema, 2011) and can be used to establish climatologies (Bennartz and Rausch, 2017). Such relationships are less trivial for ice clouds due to the high complexity and variability of ice nucleation processes Lohmann, 2002, 2003;Ickes et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%