2012
DOI: 10.7196/samj.5625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of HIV care programmes using centrally collected laboratory results: Can we monitor ART programme effectiveness?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used data from the Southern African Catholic Bishops Conference cohort to estimate mean age ± SD (37 ± 10 years), sex distribution (33% male), HIV RNA level distributions (46% with an HIV RNA level of > 100 000 copies/mL), and mean CD4 + T-cell count at ART initiation (112–178 cells/µL during 2004–2011) of the simulated cohorts [22, 23]. HIV disease natural history parameters, including chronic AIDS mortality and opportunistic disease incidence and mortality, were taken from the Cape Town AIDS Cohort [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used data from the Southern African Catholic Bishops Conference cohort to estimate mean age ± SD (37 ± 10 years), sex distribution (33% male), HIV RNA level distributions (46% with an HIV RNA level of > 100 000 copies/mL), and mean CD4 + T-cell count at ART initiation (112–178 cells/µL during 2004–2011) of the simulated cohorts [22, 23]. HIV disease natural history parameters, including chronic AIDS mortality and opportunistic disease incidence and mortality, were taken from the Cape Town AIDS Cohort [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses included alternative inputs reflecting uncertainty in numbers of persons initiating ART each year [1], mean CD4 + T-cell count upon ART initiation [22, 23], CD4 + T-cell count and HIV RNA level monitoring availability [20, 31, 32], ART efficacy [26, 3337], second-line ART availability [21], and ART program retention (Supplementary Materials) [14, 15]. We also simultaneously changed all of these variables to generate best- and worst-case scenarios reflecting uncertainty in all base-case inputs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on the routine monitoring of patients had great utility for assessment of the population health; therefore, the effectiveness of the cART program must be continuously evaluated. Reported laboratory data are useful to achieve this goal, easy to collect, as well as reliable and scalable from a single clinic to an entire population 30 . We recognize that the retrospective design of our analysis and the absence of certain data, as adherence to therapy for individuals analyzed, proportion of individuals diagnosed and undiagnosed at our region, as well as proportion of lost during the follow-up period due to death or migration, are some limitations of this study.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%