2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of inland waters: Challenges, progress and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
265
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 551 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
265
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite all the advantages described above, the success of these physics-based approaches depends on two requirements: (1) remote sensing reflectance spectra must be accurately measured; and (2) model inputs including the depth, bottom reflectance, and water IOPs must be accurate for the sites of interest [9]. While much attention has been paid to collecting coincident measurements of IOPs and AOPs for oceanic systems (e.g., NASA SeaWiFS Bio-optical Archive and Storage System, http://seabass.gsfc.nasa.gov/), inland waters, especially river systems, have been poorly observed, even though what happens in ocean and coastal waters is highly dependent on these systems [16]. It is therefore important and necessary to develop a similar database/archive for bio-optical data of inland waters and make it accessible to the whole scientific community [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all the advantages described above, the success of these physics-based approaches depends on two requirements: (1) remote sensing reflectance spectra must be accurately measured; and (2) model inputs including the depth, bottom reflectance, and water IOPs must be accurate for the sites of interest [9]. While much attention has been paid to collecting coincident measurements of IOPs and AOPs for oceanic systems (e.g., NASA SeaWiFS Bio-optical Archive and Storage System, http://seabass.gsfc.nasa.gov/), inland waters, especially river systems, have been poorly observed, even though what happens in ocean and coastal waters is highly dependent on these systems [16]. It is therefore important and necessary to develop a similar database/archive for bio-optical data of inland waters and make it accessible to the whole scientific community [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global change affects the environmental conditions rapidly. Therefore, Palmer et al [10] recommend more frequent observations of freshwater lakes to detect changes in water quality at an early stage. Remote sensing offers a timeand cost-effective method to support monitoring approaches including those recommended by the WFD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its capability to deliver information at high spatiotemporal resolution, remote sensing methods offer the potential to observe detailed seasonal changes in macrophyte distribution and water quality [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. It can complement hitherto in-situ data collection along transects by divers and is suggested for closing the gap between the snapshots of in-situ mappings of the WFD [10,20]. It is expected that a high revisiting frequency may compensate the information loss compared to in-situ mapping by divers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocean color remote sensing offers new operational satellite missions based on medium ground resolution (of the order of 250 m) sensors, like the European Earth Observation Copernicus program Sentinel-3 Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) mission, and the US Joint Polar Satellite System program Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensors. These radiometers are particularly suitable for remote-sensing observations of inland water bodies and estuaries (Palmer et al, 2015;Kwiatkowska et al, 2016). The optical properties of CDOM, abundant in fresh and estuarine waters at high concentrations, shift the spectral maximum of the water transparency to solar radiation and water-leaving radiance towards the longer wavelengths (Darecki et al, 2003;Morel and Gentili, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%