Watershed Management 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1061/9780784483060.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing of River Velocity Using Drone Video and Optical Flow Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional RSV measurements usually rely on propeller velocimeters and acoustic doppler current profilers [3]- [6], which are based on contact measurements and can only retrieve RSV of a relatively small area. As these methods are both of limited efficiency and dangerous to operate under extreme conditions, image-based velocimetry methods, such as large-scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV) [7]- [9], space-time image velocimetry (STIV) [10]- [12], and optical flow velocimetry (OFV) [13]- [15] have been proposed as substitution for efficient and convenient RSV estimation. But when it comes to practical application, LSPIV-based methods depend on tracers for good performance, and STIVbased methods are sensitive to normal optical noises and inapplicable to river with vortices and turbulence, whereas OFV-based methods show low requirement of tracers [16] and produced pixel-wise flow field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional RSV measurements usually rely on propeller velocimeters and acoustic doppler current profilers [3]- [6], which are based on contact measurements and can only retrieve RSV of a relatively small area. As these methods are both of limited efficiency and dangerous to operate under extreme conditions, image-based velocimetry methods, such as large-scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV) [7]- [9], space-time image velocimetry (STIV) [10]- [12], and optical flow velocimetry (OFV) [13]- [15] have been proposed as substitution for efficient and convenient RSV estimation. But when it comes to practical application, LSPIV-based methods depend on tracers for good performance, and STIVbased methods are sensitive to normal optical noises and inapplicable to river with vortices and turbulence, whereas OFV-based methods show low requirement of tracers [16] and produced pixel-wise flow field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OFV-based methods utilize optical flow estimation for pixel-level displacement estimation and their accuracy mainly depends on the accuracy of the optical flow estimation model. As the optical flow estimation methods based on deep learning perform better than the traditional ones and are free of burdensome hyper-parameter settings, many research groups have employed them and have reported satisfactory results [14], [15], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%