Remote Sensing of the Cryosphere 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118368909.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of snow extent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decades, a number of studies have advanced our understanding of spatiotemporal changes in snow cover extent (e.g., refs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]; however, snow cover observations do not directly provide information about changes in the amount of SWE and the water storage in the snowpack. Despite significant progress in the remote sensing of snow, many challenges remain when estimating the distribution of SWE both in the Northern Hemisphere, where an estimated 98% of the global snow cover occurs (12), as well as globally (13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, a number of studies have advanced our understanding of spatiotemporal changes in snow cover extent (e.g., refs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]; however, snow cover observations do not directly provide information about changes in the amount of SWE and the water storage in the snowpack. Despite significant progress in the remote sensing of snow, many challenges remain when estimating the distribution of SWE both in the Northern Hemisphere, where an estimated 98% of the global snow cover occurs (12), as well as globally (13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDSI was calculated with the observed Landsat image and used to identify areas with snow (NDSI ≥ 0.4; [45]) and without snow (NDSI < 0.4). The RMSE for STARFM predictions in snow-covered areas was compared with non-snow areas to determine if errors were larger.…”
Section: Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pixel with an NDSI > 0.4 is assumed to have snow cover (binary result: snow or no snow), while a pixel with an NDSI ≤ 0.4 is snowfree [19]. This global snow cover algorithm has been subjected to several refinements over the years and different thresholds have been incorporated into its general formula [14]. Nevertheless, it is widely known that the NDSI has problems in differentiating snow from clouds [15,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%