2001
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0925:rsotts>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing of the Thermodynamic State of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer by Ground-Based Microwave Radiometry

Abstract: First results are presented of 18 months' experience with a microwave profiler that has been in operation in an unattended mode. Profiles of temperature and water vapor were retrieved without bias by a statistical regression method that was more accurate as opposed to a neural network approach, in particular for water vapor. Cloud liquid water was estimated by a neural network. The accuracy of the retrieved profiles estimated against quasisimultaneous radiosonde measurements are of comparable quality to that o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
107
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies evaluating the accuracy of MWR measurements using radiosonde observations show consistent results with differences of 1-2 K in temperature, < 0.4 g m −3 in water vapor density, and < 20 % in humidity for most weather conditions (Güldner and Spänkuch, 2001;Liljegren et al, 2001;Ware et al, 2003;Crewell and Löhnert, 2007;Cimini et al, 2011;Löhnert and Maier, 2012). Similar results were derived from comparisons between MWR and in situ tower observations with differences in temperature ranging from 0.7-1.7 K (Crewell and Löhnert, 2007;Friedrich et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies evaluating the accuracy of MWR measurements using radiosonde observations show consistent results with differences of 1-2 K in temperature, < 0.4 g m −3 in water vapor density, and < 20 % in humidity for most weather conditions (Güldner and Spänkuch, 2001;Liljegren et al, 2001;Ware et al, 2003;Crewell and Löhnert, 2007;Cimini et al, 2011;Löhnert and Maier, 2012). Similar results were derived from comparisons between MWR and in situ tower observations with differences in temperature ranging from 0.7-1.7 K (Crewell and Löhnert, 2007;Friedrich et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Several studies have focused on evaluating the accuracy of temperature, water vapor density, and humidity retrieved by MWRs (e.g., Güldner and Spänkuch, 2001;Liljegren et al, 2001;Ware et al, 2003;Crewell and Löhnert, 2007;Cimini et al, 2011;Friedrich et al, 2012;Löhnert and Maier, 2012) and virtual temperature (T v ) retrieved by WPRs with RASS (May et al, 1989;Moran and Strauch, 1994;Angevine et al, 1998;Görsdorf and Lehmann, 2000). Studies evaluating the accuracy of MWR measurements using radiosonde observations show consistent results with differences of 1-2 K in temperature, < 0.4 g m −3 in water vapor density, and < 20 % in humidity for most weather conditions (Güldner and Spänkuch, 2001;Liljegren et al, 2001;Ware et al, 2003;Crewell and Löhnert, 2007;Cimini et al, 2011;Löhnert and Maier, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar discrepancies in the temperature were found in other studies where colocated radiosondes and microwave radiometers were compared. Güldner and Spänkuch (2001) reported differences of 0.7 K in the planetary boundary layer and 1.6 K at 7 km while Löhnert and Maier (2012) found discrepancies of 0.5 K in the lower boundary layer that increased to 1.7 K at 4 km height. In order to better understand the cloud effect on the temperature retrievals we have classified the different cloud cases according to the amount of liquid water.…”
Section: Statistical Study Of Temperature Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses observations from the Radiometrics TP/WVP-3000 microwave radiometer (Güldner and Spankuch, 2001), but with a rapid observing cycle to allow the passage of cloud to be resolved for the first time with this type of radiometer in the UK. The radiometer viewed in the zenith direction with very high time resolution (∼12 s).…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%